Claw
Erudite
..for no good reason.
I would think that acting like a shit-disturber would qualify, but that's just me.Claw said:..for no good reason.
are there no objective criteria ?MSFD said:Every review out there is "honest," even the ones you disagree with. People are generally "honest" when they express their opinions, and not all of them are the same. A lot of time passed between Oblivion's release and all the Game of the Year awards it was nominated for and in some cases, won. Those clearly weren't knee-jerk reactions. A lot of people "honestly" like the game, whether you agree with them or not. The opinions of authors who gave Oblivion positive reviews are every bit as valid as this reviewer's.
Bursk said:I feel that Summer should come in and lock this thread; too many people are saying bad things about the game
taxacaria at ESF said:yeah - that's the way Auntie Beth is handling criticism usually,
and you can see this practice at the sites they have blacklisted like don't bypass the autocensor.
LCJr. said:Selective memory FrancoTau? What I asked for was less, or more like enough already, of the Oblivion/Gothic 3 crap and more coverage of indies or mainstream projects people might actually be interested in.
elander_ said:LCJr. said:Selective memory FrancoTau? What I asked for was less, or more like enough already, of the Oblivion/Gothic 3 crap and more coverage of indies or mainstream projects people might actually be interested in.
If indie games devs hyped their games a bit more that might actualy be possible. The news site can't do that for them.
Considering the uproar caused by the Ban of Volourn, clearly the hivemind disagrees.Ahzaruuk said:I would think that acting like a shit-disturber would qualify, but that's just me.
For one blissful day.One Wolf said:volly got banned?
Jed said:For one blissful day.One Wolf said:volly got banned?