Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Oblivion review at Firing Squad - 60%

doctor_kaz

Scholar
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
517
Location
Ohio, USA
While I don't agree at all with the overall score, it's nice to see a review occasionally that actually gives a balanced picture of the game's strengths and problems. I'm tired of reading on sites like ign and Gamespot about how great level and loot scaling is.
 

taxacaria

Scholar
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
343
Location
Waterdeep
MSFD's reaction

MSFD said:
Every review out there is "honest," even the ones you disagree with. People are generally "honest" when they express their opinions, and not all of them are the same. A lot of time passed between Oblivion's release and all the Game of the Year awards it was nominated for and in some cases, won. Those clearly weren't knee-jerk reactions. A lot of people "honestly" like the game, whether you agree with them or not. The opinions of authors who gave Oblivion positive reviews are every bit as valid as this reviewer's.
are there no objective criteria ?

---edit1---

Bursk said:
I feel that Summer should come in and lock this thread; too many people are saying bad things about the game

___edit2____

taxacaria at ESF said:
yeah - that's the way Auntie Beth is handling criticism usually,
and you can see this practice at the sites they have blacklisted like don't bypass the autocensor.

*g*
btw - the review thread at ESF has been closed.
 

elander_

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
2,015
LCJr. said:
Selective memory FrancoTau? What I asked for was less, or more like enough already, of the Oblivion/Gothic 3 crap and more coverage of indies or mainstream projects people might actually be interested in.

If indie games devs hyped their games a bit more that might actualy be possible. The news site can't do that for them.
 

LCJr.

Erudite
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
2,469
elander_ said:
LCJr. said:
Selective memory FrancoTau? What I asked for was less, or more like enough already, of the Oblivion/Gothic 3 crap and more coverage of indies or mainstream projects people might actually be interested in.

If indie games devs hyped their games a bit more that might actualy be possible. The news site can't do that for them.

You don't have to hype them just report on them. Pretty much every project has a webpage these days. You just have to look for them on the indie sites and places like Sourceforge. Sad thing is 99% of them are MMO's(or tools for MMO's) or FF clones.
 

Dmitron

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,918
I thought FireSquad was a hardware site? Haven't been there in years..
 

One Wolf

Scholar
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
311
Location
Planet X
god dammit! i go away to a tourney and miss a good ol' time on the codex. i demand a recount (no).

by the way, did someone mess with those numbers before retardo land or did volly really get roasted that bad? i'm not surprised, but damn.
 

dagorkan

Arbiter
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
5,164
Yeah 6000 people were interested enough to vote for a ban. Though only about 100 people post on this forum... What do you think?
 

One Wolf

Scholar
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
311
Location
Planet X
my illusion of a massive codex fanbase....smashed.

*sob*
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom