Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Development Info Peter Molyneux wants you to think about death

hiciacit

hiciacit

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 25, 2005
Messages
406
Location
I've been there
galsiah said:
Not to see/consider them is unnecessarily restrictive. To see them as some amazing leap forward is also daft - they're simply options.
New options are great, so long as they aren't chosen over old methods simply for novelty's sake.
Click to expand...

Exactly! All that banter about being innovative makes me want to kick him in the nuts. Hard. The man's acting like he just invented hot water or something.
 
AZ

AZ

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
467
Anyone played Omikron? I liked the way you could not die.
 
Mayday

Mayday

Augur
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
1,000
Location
Poland
Come on people. It's not that difficult making a setting which, by its nature- makes death unimportant.

The real challenge is taking care of death in a more or less normal fantasy setting, playing a mortal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom