Thanks for the detailed feedback! I think between you and ProphetSword these are enough changes to merit another version, so I will probably do that tomorrow.
the main issue here is how vague it all is -- is it a classless system or not? Just pick one, making up my own rules is easy enough. If it's a class system provide some sample classes, and also give an actual list of 'abilities' (just call them skills tbh, that's the standard jargon at this point) that GMs can build on.
This system definitely depends a lot on the abilities and classes that come with a setting, so I'll probably write up a sample setting soon. I mean, I was already starting down that road with the optional sections at the end. I purposely de-emphasized classes to the point that this system could even work classless, but I do intend for most settings to have classes, and I might write two sample settings: one with classes, and one without. Maybe it'll sound less vague if I point out that classes don't do a ton, so even if you technically have classes, it's basically the same as being classless.
Incidentally, the reason I called them "abilities" and not "skills" was alluded to in the section about abilities: to me the word "skill" implies something you learned (ie. a learned skill) whereas these can also be natural abilities that just kinda manifest over time. That said, maybe I will change to the word "skill". I definitely kept catching myself referring to them as "skills" and (as the final bionics section points out) the word "ability" doesn't really encompass everything either, so sometimes you just need to call it an "enhancement" but use the exact same mechanics as a skill.
XP rewards seem very generous too, 10 XP per adventure is a new skill point even for shitty characters, and two for skilled ones, basically every session -- assuming 'adventures' are supposed to last that long ('per adventure' rewards also make campaigns that have no clear break point per adventure tough to adjudicate btw. Certainly a concern if you want to use this for CRPGs). I would prefer to see more granular rewards, with suggestions for per session rewards based on character actions.
On the one hand, I think you missed where I said "assuming an adventure takes around three sessions". That said, I could reword this to be both clearer and seem more granular: how about "Award XP at logical stopping points, like the end of an adventure or the party rests at an inn, at an average rate of 3 XP per session." The way this would work for CRPGs is you wouldn't get XP from combat, but instead you get XP when you clear a dungeon.
Incidentally, the XP mechanics were one part that got reworked A LOT from previous drafts. Originally I had XP more similar to DnD, with much higher costs and awards depending on how the difficulty of the enemies defeated. But someone pointed out that one of my stated goals was to be simpler than DnD, and they frequently houserule simpler XP mechanics. Originally the XP mechanics involved a lot of math, and they pointed out that while math is fine on a computer, tabletop games should minimize the amount of math.
In the absence of a separate stat, 'Charisma' skills would be better off being based on WIL. How many unlikable smart people have you met? (billions if not trillions)
Good point. WIL doesn't really do a ton right now anyway, so it'll be nice to give it more reason to exist.
The advancement rules are very sensible btw. I've thought for a while that skill + attribute systems are goofy, in that they either make raw talent more important than anything else or discount talent in the learning process.
Thanks! The progression mechanics are the part I'm most proud of and think are most interesting, possibly even unique. This does delve into philosophy of learning beyond games, nature versus nurture and all that. I definitely fall into the camp that I think society overemphasizes natural talent, and that "talent" is often just people practicing so much that they make it look easy.
there's heaps of games like this. Off the top of my head, Traveller, Advanced Fighting Fantasy and Barbarians of Lemuria all use 2d6 resolution systems. Getting away from the two cubes, Savage Worlds, The Fantasy Trip, Call of Cthulhu (and many other Chaosium-descended RPGs) and Tunnels and Trolls qualify as well. Sheeeeeeit, even D&D can be less cumbersome than D&D sometimes -- see TSR-era Basic D&D and it's many retroclones (google OSR).
Yeah the progression mechanics are the ONLY part that's even possibly unique. On the itch.io page I list out a bunch of other games that I got ideas from. In particular, I basically hacked a lightweight system I found called LARA. Also, one of my sample settings is likely to be very similar to Beyond the Supernatural (which is a lot like Call of Cthulhu).