Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview RockPaperShotgun Wasteland 2 Interview with Chris Avellone

thesoup

Arcane
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
7,599
Indeed it isn't. However, I can cop out by saying I'm not a native speaker.

Well, actually, I just forgot to delete 's' after I added "(and other combatfags)".
 

Stinger

Arcane
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
1,366
Wizardry (and other combatfags) basically wants strategy games, not RPG's, as someone already pointed out.:smug:


Couldn't have said it so succinctly :salute:
 

Shannow

Waster of Time
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,386
Location
Finnegan's Wake
Well wasn't that biased.
Combatfags. Horrible creatures, I avoid them were I can :obviously:
Codex cannot into "What goes around, comes around".
*facepalm*

Also, your extreme definitions are wrong, exclude the vast majority of the actual members of the camps (so much so that by your definition there'd be 2-3 people at most in each camp), don't allow for people to be in both camps, are not as charmingly hyperbolic as mine and you are stupid. :rpgcodex:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom