People bashing rpgs for being rpgs and not some console shit with lite rpg elements.
We should waste time bashing popamole crap so we could get "haerdcore" points and only then we could criticize an RPG? That doesn't make any sense.
doing real and significant damage to real rpg developers.
Basic function of a videogame is to entertain you. I symphatize with someone wanting more RPGs to be made but if those RPGs are boring videogames failing on their basic function as videogames, I don't see the point.
What lesson does this teach developers? Make shitty rpg like hipster shit or some other type of safe game that is far easier to make than real rpgs.
Yeah, so lying to make their little special snowflakes egoes better, saying their shitty games aren't shitty will teach them what? To continue making shit games? No, thanks.
It is impossible to have a conversation with retards or people who do not even like the genre.
Of course, not liking a game is like not liking a whole genre. If I don't like Call of Duty, I won't like Doom because, of course, both are completely similar because they are on the same genre.
The only people that seem to be able to string a coherent sentence together are some how drama mad sycophants who are far too filled with rage to have an actual debate with.
A debate involve two sides, if you say you won't engage people because they are "mad sycophants", then there won't be a debate by definition, this is circular logic. Circular logic is the kind of shit people that don't wanna debates use. "I won't have a debate with you because I don't like you, why won't you debate with me?" The areguments about the game were made, you say what you think about them or continue whining, your choice.
Also, I hope you do not think I would write Roqua on my account and then state I am not him.
Hi, Roqua.