I don't see why not though. People can make custom planets suited towards particular life sim gameplay styles (e.g. aforementioned farming, survivalism in a place with bad habitability and/or stronger hostile aliens etc etc).
The question is "can they?", there's no modding tools out yet, we don't know what people can do.
The thing is, it'll all be so disjointed. With Skyrim you can integrate something like farming because it fits into the world, you can make all the existing objects interactible and give them new purposes, so you can have some new mechanic where the ground starts randomly spawning gourds or w/e the fuck and the player can "harvest" them and sell them.
Wtf, no Creation Kit til 2024? Todd's business decisions are consistently some of the worst in the industry. They should have had the CK ready to go on release and let people get stuck in immediately fixing the game.
of course. It’s capitalism. People owning businesses like the rich guy in Constellation, then you have all the poors living in The Well and miners working for little pay. expensive restaurants for the rich, and Chunks for the poor. etc.
Most likely I'd wager. Skyrim was done in the same engine, so I don't see why Starfield would be any different in regards to overall modding capabilities.
I wouldn't be surprised if modders will be able to mess with the procgen stuff itself once the modding tools are released tbh. Perhaps that's why it's taking so long for the creation kit to be released in the first place.
Ever worked with VBS? (Just curious).
why would you doxx yourself like that for some internet penis points
People really liked that A-B "you can climb that mountain" adventure in Skyrim and this game replaces all of that with a bad menu system and fast travel, so I'm not sure it even appeals to the most casual Skyrim player.
Bro these morons think Lovelace writing down Babbage's words makes her the first programmer, they don't care about facts.
I know you're being sarcastic, but Behold!
Yes, people were far too harsh with No Man's Sky, which was still a project by a small indie developer. I thought No Man's Sky was too streamlined, but in Starfield, there's no atmospheric entry, no flying over planets—nothing. They aren't even bothering with it. And we're talking about a game with a considerable budget, many years of development, many hires, and massive outsourcing. It's bound to human nature to be dissatisfied, but we certainly should have appreciated more all those indies who were even running on potato PCs.The planet exploration is entirely unique within video games and if you have theit might be enough for you, but I think there are many space game enthusiasts who aren't happy unless they get the Star Citizen as promised by Chris Roberts. It has to have the most advanced space dogfights seen in a video game as of yet, it has to have a fully simulated economy, it has to be an MMO, it has to have unique Ubisoft styled point of interests on thousands of planets. You can't just find a neat planet in NMS, land on it, interact with the wildlife, find some unmarked place that's neat and then take off. That isn't content. Content is when you speak to a character and get a checkbox and then go to a bandit camp in space, clear it out and get a purple item. It also has to be a great first person shooter (impossible with modern game design and fidelity, extra impossible with procgen).
They're retarded because they will shit on all the games that do one part of this great. No Man's Sky has the best procedurally generated content on the market, seamless space to planet landings, no load times, etc. Outer Wilds has the best handcrafted content and science fiction plot since games in the 90's and people are shitting on it for not being Elite or something, idk, it got a pretty bad response in the Codex thread last time I checked.
Then they get first person Diablo in space, now with extra loading screens and none of the features that made the TES series noteworthy and they gobble it up. They can even shit out a turd of political agitation on top of the goyslop stew and they'll still slurp it up. Or they'll sign over their entire bank account to Christ Roberts who's selling jpegs instead of jerry rigging netimmerse to make a woke "space" game.
The major fuckup of Sean Murray was making a game that was at all appealing to this crowd.
Also, Loading Screens: The Game that's just awful. At least in No Man's Sky you actually fly and land on a planet with no loading screens (they are loaded as you approach the planet).
Also, Deus Ex 2. I thought it was okay. NMS was very boring for me though, but that's probably because I'm just not into survival indie games with crafting mechanics.
Like I said before, Starfield will incorporate mods really well precisely because it is an empty procedural game. This game will probably be the undisputed space adventure game once DLC/mods add in a survival mode and more radiant locations/events.
