Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview The Old-School Charm of Fallout 3

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
It's interesting to me. I will lurk in a lot of forums -- never post, but see -- and one of the things you hear a lot is, when we've released a couple dialogue screenshots, "Oh, those dialogue options are so short!" Well, if you look in a lot of --

Todd Howard, executive producer: (Pokes head into interview) Emil lies!

EP: It's all true! I swear! I created Fallout.

But really, if you look in Fallout, there are a lot of short dialogue options. So you're right, there is a bit of a mythical quality there.
Wow, he actually just tried to convince us that we're full of shit and that we actually imagined those dialogue options.
 

LarsTheSurly

Scholar
Joined
Aug 1, 2008
Messages
137
Location
Surrounded by idiots
I think he needs to pay more attention. It's not so much "Those dialogue options are so short!" but more "Those dialogue options are so generic and poorly written!"
 

elander_

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
2,015
And those dialogs are not very cheesy or so badly acted either which is a point for Emil, but when writers are forced to create choices that fit into the simplistic Karma system which is nothing more than a popularity meter don't expect Fallout 3 to be very interesting or mature in the intelligent and deep definition of mature.
 

uhjghvt

Scholar
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
463
the only reason there is reading is the voice acting is so shitty everyone is going to turn it off and read the subtitles
 

Longshanks

Augur
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
897
Location
Australia.
baby arm said:
<a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3775/revitalizing_a_heritage_the_.php?page=1">Gamasutra</a> interviewed <a href="http://bethblog.com/index.php/2008/05/08/inside-the-vault-emil-pagliarulo-redux/">Emil Pagliarulo</a> on the writing and design of <b><a href="http://fallout.bethsoft.com/eng/home/home.php?fbid=Buwxg_">Fallout 3</a></b>.
<blockquote>My background is very much hardcore PC gamer guy. Now, I'm a big Xbox 360 player too, but I definitely still have those PC sensibilities, and those have definitely worked their way into Fallout 3.

You look at Fallout 3, there are a lot of old-school PC clues -- reading text, going into old computer screens. It's charming in a way. Old-school PC games have a lot of depth, and I think we definitely bring that.</blockquote>
Thought this was an old interview at first, said the same thing some time ago, with the addition that he worries every day that console gamers will reject the game because it's too hardcore (ie. too much reading).

Emil actually seems decent enough, and I'm sure Fallout 3 will be better for him being the lead designer, certainly better than if it were Todd.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
1,246
Cloaked Figure said:
Cloaked Figure wrote:
Vaarna_Aarne wrote:
elander_ wrote:
DefJam101 wrote:
44 75 6B 65 20 4E 75 6B 65 6D 20 33 44 20 72 69 70 73 20 6F 66 66 20 46 61 6C 6C 6F 75 74 20 33 27 73 20 68 65 61 64 20 61 6E 64 20 73 68 69 74 73 20 64 6F 77 6E 20 69 74 73 20 6E 65 63 6B 2E


Fix.
Revised.

Hexadecimalized.

Size fix-a-dized

ratingsymbol_t.gif


Rated.
 

Darth Roxor

Rattus Iratus
Staff Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,879,037
Location
Djibouti
micmu said:
The Vanished One said:
Cloaked Figure said:
Cloaked Figure wrote:
Vaarna_Aarne wrote:
elander_ wrote:
DefJam101 wrote:
44 75 6B 65 20 4E 75 6B 65 6D 20 33 44 20 72 69 70 73 20 6F 66 66 20 46 61 6C 6C 6F 75 74 20 33 27 73 20 68 65 61 64 20 61 6E 64 20 73 68 69 74 73 20 64 6F 77 6E 20 69 74 73 20 6E 65 63 6B 2E


Fix.
Revised.

Hexadecimalized.

Size fix-a-dized

ratingsymbol_t.gif


Rated.
Snipped.

restored
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"so Emil basically said that console gamers are dumb? By implying that reading text is teh hardcore.
Bethesda laughs at its target audience openly and those retards will still buy their games."

Not as dumb as the idiots on the Codex who bash FO3 nons top yet will be amongst the first in line to buy/steal/play it.

R00fles!
 

Texas Red

Whiner
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
7,044
Volourn said:
"so Emil basically said that console gamers are dumb? By implying that reading text is teh hardcore.
Bethesda laughs at its target audience openly and those retards will still buy their games."

Not as dumb as the idiots on the Codex who bash FO3 nons top yet will be amongst the first in line to buy/steal/play it.

R00fles!

I'm really tired of this baseless "argument". It's the equal to the one saying that we actually LIKE FO 3.
 

Burning Bridges

Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
27,571
Location
Tampon Bay
Wouldn't it be time now the codex started simply ignoring FO3?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom