racofer
Thread Incliner
Keep it up, guise. I'm having some good laughs from over here.
Sitra Achara said:1. New users get a 3 post limit.
2. The right to post more depends on approval/disapproval from veteran users. (at least 3 approves, and > 50% approve/disapprove ratio)
3. Voting interface - new users' posts are adorned with Yay/Nay buttons.
4. Up to 100 posts, new users are still 'on trial', and may have their posting privileges revoked by >50% disapproval. (this should hopefully prevent people from playing nice for 3 posts and then reverting to derp mode)
Too harsh. 'I invited an idiot' tag and removal of inviting rights should be enough.MapMan said:If a person gets banned, the users who invited him get banned as well.
Everybody who isn't a shitty spamming and alt-regenerating troll (examples: Andy, Drog, Prosper). Hell - even Cloaked Figure is, as long as he sticks to one account (shitlist-ignore threads-problem solved).Ed said:Who exactly are these "non-shitty oldfags"?
How exactly if they keep shitting new alts using proxies? With registrations closed, they would have to go back to already created backup alts, which would allow mods to identify and ban those as well.DF said:Rather deal with the alt problem in existing userbase.
Spammers will start spamming outside GD - see Prosper.WE said:Too harsh, just close GD for newly registered (one year would be sufficient). Problem solved.
They don't give a fuck about postcount. They want to be noticed. Like all of us, they want ATTENTION! The problem is, they're using the shittiest way of attention whoring available at 'Dex...WE said:don't count posts outside the gaming/news forums.
Mods. So, yeah - your description is spot on.pipka said:And who will decide which alt is shitty and which is not? Some weeboo? Some whiner? Some butthurt individual?
And this is wrong? That would be massive, ULTIMATE incline of the Codex.Zarniwoop said:Point number 4 will ensure the slow demise of the Codex. No-one would ever join because Codexers aren't fans of new things for the most part, and as time marches on the aforementioned "non-shitty oldfags" will die of old age/leave the Codex forever due to irreconcilable butthurt/get a life and there will be no way to bring in new blood.
Yes. But we don't need new alts of 3-10 faggots (who are retarded oldfags - Andy registered long time ago) who are responsible for 90% of the Codex's shit.CF said:BAAWW, we need new posters!
You mean - mods should start banning people? And how it's gonna stop spammers from registering new alts, using proxies?DS said:Stop being a pussy and actually do something useful.
This. I think these guys are too retarded / disabled to bother with costs of their retardation.janjetina said:It wouldn't, or it would be replaced with a low user IQ problem, given that only an idiot would pay to post on an internet forum.VentilatorOfDoom said:Make registering an account cost 10$. There, the problem of myriads of shitty alts is solved. Plus, the money can be used for better server/more RAM etc.
So you wan't me to read another Prosper657 retarded post and evaluate it? Why shoul anybody bother with this shit?SA said:approval/disapproval
I don't care about easily avoidable attention-seekingCF said:So many Codexers want to make a restrictive registration system because they think they are so "elite" and "intelligent" and that they need to keep out the "idiots".
Learn to read. People don't click ads even when they can see them.CF said:use an adblocker when visiting this site despite the several occasions DU has stated that this is one of the main problems with funding the site
I thought the point of GD was to keep the shit out of the other forums.Wise Emperor said:Too harsh, just close GD for newly registered (one year would be sufficient). Problem solved.
It's evidently not quite working.Cloaked Figure said:hypocritical Skyrim hysteria which is still going on in RPG discussion
On the other hand, there are 5 patron posters in this very thread. And advertising companies don't pay for displaying their shitty ads. They pay per click.Cloaked Figure said:when the fact of the matter is that half of the so called elite Codexers use an adblocker when visiting this site despite the several occasions DU has stated that this is one of the main problems with funding the site.
spekkio said:Yes. But we don't need new alts of 3-10 faggots (who are retarded oldfags - Andy registered long time ago) who are responsible for 90% of the Codex's shit.CF said:BAAWW, we need new posters!
I don't care about easily avoidable attention-seekingCF said:So many Codexers want to make a restrictive registration system because they think they are so "elite" and "intelligent" and that they need to keep out the "idiots".youngfat homosexuals like you. Faggots who keep creating new alts are different story.
spekkio said:1. Close registrations for 1/2 year (maybe a year, just to be sure that Prosper commits a suicide in the meantime)
2. Ban all spammers (fags who shit 2000 new topics every week and keep coming back with new alts when banned). Shitty posters and plain retards should be considered as possible targets as well.
3. Wait and check if the disease was purged (old unused alts)
4. Open registrations again, but make them invite only - every new candidate needs invites from TWO DIFFERENT non-shitty oldfags (the most fragile part of this concept) to be able to register. If both of them use the same IP - see point 2. Limit monthly / yearly number of invites per user (should bring the number of alts down).
5. ???
6. PROFIT! (prestigious magazine, server load reduced)
That's all.
Nice beginning but the rest makes it 2/5.CF said:You want to kill all traffic to an already underfunded site so you can stop a couple of alts who are not even annoying or causing any big problems
Wouldn't decreasing the traffic lessen the server problems?Cloaked Figure said:You want to kill all traffic to an already underfunded site
spekkio said:And this is wrong? That would be massive, ULTIMATE incline of the Codex.Zarniwoop said:Point number 4 will ensure the slow demise of the Codex. No-one would ever join because Codexers aren't fans of new things for the most part, and as time marches on the aforementioned "non-shitty oldfags" will die of old age/leave the Codex forever due to irreconcilable butthurt/get a life and there will be no way to bring in new blood.
But to be serious - you know your point is actually bullshit. People are and will be too interested in posting on non-moderated MB.
Bad idea per se - who should judge which poster is shit and which isn't?Shitty posters and plain retards should be considered as possible targets as well.
And why do you care for alts and new members so much, CF? Existing alts are shit and 99% of new posters are either alts or shit as well. Where's the problem?
more derp
Try one of gay dating sites if you want attention so much, thinking seems too hard for you...
That's the whole fucking point.cuts off any possibility of new members, getting the required invites will be next to impossible!
Possible solutions:Firstly, how would you even get in touch with a codexer to express interest in joining the community.
Maybe kicking out some retards could change this a bit?Plus the Codex isn't a place most of us would actively talk about in public either so I think we can rule out any interest being expressed there
I only propose removing recruiting privileges if somebody fucks up. Tagging can only inrease lulz. Banning is too much.The system does not encourage recruiting, it discourages it, the penalty for inviting one shit poster is severe
I can live with 1&2. As for 3 - if they're intelligent enough and behave, they will find a way in. But if they fuck up, we will at least know who was responsible for inviting them.It basically means there would be no new shit posters, no new alts and no new quality posters.
Sorry to break it for you, but shitting new threads in GD is not 'activity'.Then there is the current member base, people will get bored, butthurted, banned or just move on and activity will decline as a result.
It will be the death of the Codex [as we know it]
Thank you for putting me in my place, with your crystal-clear reasoning and perfect use of English, mr Remarkable Poster.CF said:
spekkio said:Thank you for putting me in my place, with your crystal-clear reasoning and perfect use of English, mr Remarkable Poster
Cloaked Figure said:I love how it's always the least remarkable posters spouting this idiocy. Tell me why the fuck YOU aren't a shitty poster
Crooked Dick said:Cloaked Figure said:I love how it's always the least remarkable posters spouting this idiocy. Tell me why the fuck YOU aren't a shitty poster
I hate to break it to you, dear black rural boy, but spekkio is a much more remarkable poster than you could ever hope to be. Then again, you only tend to shit-post in GD, so whaddya know.