Elwro
Arcane
@Stauff: True! I thought that at last the site would get more "public" recognition - Obsidian, CDP Red...
Maybe, maybe not. It's still under staff-forum debate. Besides, it'd be DU or myself implementing it anyway. Though this begs the question: why not just go to DAC's wasteland if that's your thang?Spacemoose said:now that he's taking a vacation from moderating, this initiative will probably stall which sucks
I was rather under the impression that the 'consent' was in your favour by a margin of two to one. Or were there not enough votes?Vault Dweller said:Anyway, that's why I'm out. I don't want to enforce anything without the overall consent.
Meant admins, not all posters.Elwro said:@VD: I have no idea about the validity of the results of the "Vote for our future!" poll, but it seems most people want a more controlled RPG Codex. (I do.) Also, I really hope you continue to post, most content in here is really prima sort.
Spacemoose said:elhoim, nedrah, jedilearner and a bunch of others:
I cannot believe the staggering amounts of your faggotry. "dare to use the name of che guevara" :barf: stop taking things so seriously
Elwro said:@VD: I have no idea about the validity of the results of the "Vote for our future!" poll, but it seems most people want a more controlled RPG Codex. (I do.) Also, I really hope you continue to post, most content in here is really prima sort.
Spacemoose said:after my ban I was negotiating with him about establishing a "demilitarized zone" subforum where regulars could bullshit with few restrictions, leaving GD to have undisturbed "serious discussions"
Spam sections never work, speaking from experience. For whatever reason, they tend to decrease activity in the more "serious" general discussion board(s), and bring the forum down a bit as a whole. I would vote against that particular idea.
Well, it was unlocked yesterday and I can't say that I liked the results. I'd vote against it now.Calis said:Maybe, maybe not. It's still under staff-forum debate. Besides, it'd be DU or myself implementing it anyway. Though this begs the question: why not just go to DAC's wasteland if that's your thang?Spacemoose said:now that he's taking a vacation from moderating, this initiative will probably stall which sucks
Stauff said:The most troublesome thing is that now many pretty damn good developers start actually pointing people to Codex on their websites (Obsidian and CD Project f.ex). This may help some poor sods drowned in Beth soft to understand what it makes to play REAL role-playing games. Of course Codex is good for its democracy but it's really bad that newbies will see all this internet dramas, totally useless imho... As for Vault Dweller leave, currently it's the worst time to leave, while we have a decent RPG year finally. It's time to celebrate, not quarrel, damn it...
mainly because I like it here. going to DAC means another set of forumites/posters and I like the codex crowdCalis said:Maybe, maybe not. It's still under staff-forum debate. Besides, it'd be DU or myself implementing it anyway. Though this begs the question: why not just go to DAC's wasteland if that's your thang?
Vault Dweller said:I don't want to enforce anything without the overall consent.
Don't worry. My somewhat-forceful way to have VD take a break was, like I said, mainly for his own good. I have no qualms about instituting further moderation whatever whichever poll says, and I'm sure DU doesn't, either. Though obviously with different people doing it, the style will be different.Brother None said:Vault Dweller said:I don't want to enforce anything without the overall consent.
Well, there's where it all goes to shit, then.
But I'll leave the backbenching to the regulars.
Brother None said:Vault Dweller said:I don't want to enforce anything without the overall consent.
The whole freedom breeds intellectuals crap is anarcho-commie bullshit anyway.
I wouldn't like to see Codex without any LULZ about Oblivion or just-released next-gen games.
Yes.Brother None said:Perhaps you're trying to have your cake and eat it too. The good, deep RPG discussions are the cake, the eating is the lulz. The two just don't mix, water and fire. The whole freedom breeds intellectuals crap is anarcho-commie bullshit anyway.
that's because you LOOOVE authority. can't get away from your roots it seemsnedrah said:. That being said, I'm more than surprised that those people that actively took part in hijacking and messing up the site are still allowed to pat themselves on their backs publically.
Jora said:Yes.Brother None said:Perhaps you're trying to have your cake and eat it too. The good, deep RPG discussions are the cake, the eating is the lulz. The two just don't mix, water and fire. The whole freedom breeds intellectuals crap is anarcho-commie bullshit anyway.
I'd rather have VD's newsposts, interviews, round tables, and insights than a group of lulzers who use this place as their 4chan.
Cassidy said:And no, there can be a balance between jokes and CRPGs... I wouldn't like to see Codex without any LULZ about Oblivion or just-released next-gen games.
Cassidy said:Offtopic 2: Hey BN! Any news about Beardude's "expansion pack" for Fallout 2?