Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Theldaran

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
1,772
I think that Kingmaker has had better discounts than Deadfire, on top of being a more faithful representation of tabletop RPG.

For example, you can grab Kingmaker now (basic edition) for around 15 bucks at Fanatical. That's a great price. Meanwhile Deadfire is around the double of that at the same store.

Overall both games are heavily laden with DLC so they fall under the bane of modern games. In that sense, Age of Decadence and Underrail were truer.
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
9,522
Location
Grand Chien

Razzoriel

Genos Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
104
Both games have awful, terrible aesthetics and companion choices. Those who liked the games, fine, just don't kid yourself that Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale or heck, even Neverwinter Night's choppy 3d graphics were less well-placed.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom