Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
WhiteShark
Reactions
210 729 25 5 15

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • it's ok buddy, your ass it's safe from the tranny manace.
    Fedora Master
    Fedora Master
    Johnny you do understand that trannies aren't the big titted futas from your animus and mangos?
    WhiteShark
    WhiteShark
    The one nice thing about the tranny is that, like a magnet, its mere presence draws to itself and reveals all the worthless posters on the Codex.
    Jonathan "Zee Nekomimi
    Jonathan "Zee Nekomimi
    @Fedora who said then are lmao. I'm enjoying the shit show and codex obsession's with everything tranny.

    :neveraskedforthis:
    Intentionally misspelling "brain" as "brian" is an old RPG Codex tradition.

    I'd thought you would have known that by now.
    I think there's a case for Multiversal Solipsism.
    PapaPetro
    Haha it's ok. I'm kinda a blowhard.
    WhiteShark
    WhiteShark
    Are you a seminarian or a student or something? Seems like you have a lot of this stuff fresh on your mind. I haven't read much in this sort of epistemological/ontological philosophy in a long time (12+ years I think). Most of what I read these days is either historical or spiritual (or both, in the case of hagiographies).
    PapaPetro
    Na, just read old 2nd AD&D books and shit man. I think about metaphysics a lot.
    STOP FUCKING ALERTING ME YOU FUCKING FUCK
    Generic-Giant-Spider
    YEAH ISNT SO FUN NOW IS IT HUH HAHAHA I CAN BITE BACK TOO LOOK AT THESE CHOMPERS
    WhiteShark
    WhiteShark
    You don't turn off alerts for post ratings? Either way, I think I'm at the part where you're banned now so it should slow down. : D
    Generic-Giant-Spider
    HAHAHAHA JUST WAIT UNTIL NEXT TOPIC! IT WILL BE MY MOST DEVIOUS PLAN YET.
    A few light bulbs just went off, EOIII as the last DS EO is the last one to not feature difficulty settings. All others, and the remakes of I+II, feature hard modes. I was wondering how the hell you called EO combat low skill ceiling compared to other turn based games, that explains a lot.
    Thac0
    Thac0
    Not every game can be Xcom, Jagged Alliance or Heroes of Might and Magic. EO has a good bit more depth than a decent number of tactical games, despite lack of a grid.
    WhiteShark
    WhiteShark
    I agree that it is possible to invalidate the grid through poor design, but that doesn't change the principle that grids add loads more tactical complexity than gridless is capable of. Troubleshooter, Voidspire Tactics, Devil Survivor, etc. all have greater in-combat decision making thanks to the grid.
    Thac0
    Thac0
    Yeah but those are literally the best tactical games (and some of the best overall) games on Earth. Just because it can't reach that bar I would still call blobber combat tactical.
    When a game outperforms a good part of the tactical gaming genre without even a grid I think it is fair to call the combat tactical, even if it can't mess with the best.
    "Good versus Evil is the story of mankind and every individual within it, people will not tire of that conflict"
    Nice one
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom