Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

2002 RPGDot Awards - Most Disappointing RPG

Mistress

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
341
Location
UK
Tags: Might & Magic IX

<a href="http://www.rogdot.com">RPGDot</a> have posted the "winners" of their <a href="http://www.rpgdot.com/index.php?hsaction=10053&ID=482">Most Disappointing RPG of 2002 Award</a>.
<br>
<br>
The big "winner" was <a href="http://www.3do.com/mightandmagic/ix/">Might & Magic IX</a>. Runners up were, <a href="http://nwn.bioware.com">Neverwinter Nights</a> and <a href="http://www.dungeonsiege.com">Dungeon Siege</a>.
<br>
<br>
No surprises there for me really - given the extreme range of opinions on the game - Neverwinter Nights coming up as both one of the most disappointing and one of the best RPGs of the year was hardly a shocker. I know which one I'd go with ;-)
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,802
Location
Behind you.
I didn't play M&M9, but I can certainly agree with the runners up. Dungeon Siege just wasn't much of a game because it was way too automated, but it probably had the nicest graphics of the bunch.

NWN.. Well, we all know what was bad about it.
 

Mistress

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
341
Location
UK
Saint_Proverbius said:
I didn't play M&M9, but I can certainly agree with the runners up. Dungeon Siege just wasn't much of a game because it was way too automated, but it probably had the nicest graphics of the bunch.

NWN.. Well, we all know what was bad about it.

I took a very brief look at M&M9 - and what I saw was pretty poor. Shame really. I don't think we need expand any further on the downfalls of NWN...again...;)
 

Mistress

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
341
Location
UK
Saint_Proverbius said:
http://www.rpgdot.com/index.php#13804

This guy made me chuckle:

Comment posted by: dagoo7 @ Tuesday - January 07, 2003, 07:35 MST
While I consider myself more than something of an rpg snob, some of the readers and posters here seem to be way over the top. Just because a game does not fit your ideal of what an rpg is, or fit within your entrenched ideal subgenre does not mean it was neccessarily bad. I understand that the category of disappointment can be seen as purely subjective, i.e., I expected something particular from this game and did'nt get it. However, I think some of us need to cease being overly and stubbornly provincial and enjoy a game for what it does offer as opposed to its approximation of a preferred subgenre or personal ideal. In that sense, I think DS was a disappointment because it promised to be an RPG and it turned out not to really be one. Similarly, MM9 was a disappointment because it was so shoddily executed and horribly unbalanced. However, I don't consider MW or NWN a disappointment simply because I would rather be playing something along the lines of Wiz8, In other words both of these games tried to do something different, and succeeded in adding something valuable to the rpg genere as a whole. The market is big enough to support a whole range of RPGs and personally I would find it a horrible situation if all rpgs were different versions of Gothic (although I love Gothic and preferred it to most other rpgs out there).

I think it's funny that a lot of people like to assume that when someone disagrees with the popular opinion, they don't have a valid basis for their own opinions - they must be rabid idealists with no concept of the outside world.
 

Section8

Cipher
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
4,321
Location
Wardenclyffe
As I said to Saint yesterday - The thing that's truly sad about NWN is that I bought it expecting nothing but disappointment, and it still managed to fall short of my low expectations.
 

Rayt

Liturgist
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
192
Location
Swingin' Groningen
One thing that NWN did proof was that crpg games can be financially incredibly successfull. Thus hopefully this will encourage software designers to make even more. And there's bound to be a good one amidst them :)
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,256
Location
Chicago. And damn anyone who is not the same.
Rayt said:
One thing that NWN did proof was that crpg games can be financially incredibly successfull. Thus hopefully this will encourage software designers to make even more. And there's bound to be a good one amidst them :)
O yeah.
Everyone, just look over the fact that it is MP oriented, therefore will most likely show little real intrest in the market, and the fact that the BGies both sold multi-million copies.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom