Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview BioInterview: Games Are Not Art

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,600
Location
Deutschland
Tags: BioWare

<p>.. saying that is <strong>so </strong>"last century" <a href="http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-6202-BioWare--The-Games-Are-Not-Art-Comments-Are-%E2%80%9CSo-Last-Century%E2%80%9D.html" target="_blank">confirm the BioDocs</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;That comment is so last century,&rdquo; chimed in Muzyka, &ldquo;That&rsquo;s just the reality now. We&rsquo;re in a different&nbsp; century where that kind of &ndash; to say that games are not an art form, that interactive entertainment isn&rsquo;t relevant when there are millions and millions and millions of fans, and more every year, playing them. You know, this generation are definitely into the content. It&rsquo;s so diverse.&rdquo;</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>&ldquo;They have an emotional impact,&rdquo; said Zeschuk adamantly, &ldquo;It depends what you use as the definition, right? For us largely, it&rsquo;s things like, things that can have an emotional impact, lasting, on the person. I think that part of the problem with the debate has largely been not understanding the art form or the form of video games themselves... So, is Pac Man art? Sort of, I mean, in a way, in its simplicity it was, but you know, what we&rsquo;re doing today is completely different. Is a hack n&rsquo; slash fighting game art? Ehhhhh, that&rsquo;s marginal. You know, it&rsquo;s the same way as movies... lots of movies aren&rsquo;t art and some are. It&rsquo;s like anything else. &ldquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It's official, games are art.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Spotted at: <a href="http://www.gamebanshee.com/news/99522-bioware-interview.html">GB</a></p>
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,057
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
[cue 20 pages]

The ones who say it isn't art are usually the ones who can't get their head out of their own ass and go

-DUUUUR INTERACTIVE SO NOT ART (because art = paintings and sculptures only, amirite)
-DUUUUR DOESNT FIT MY SPECIFIC DEFINITION OF ART (that for some reason all of you uncultured fucks disagree with)
-DUUUUR ART IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE YOU FEEL X (hello, college art degree)

And the discussion is useless anyway, since people can't even agree on a definition for "art". Like the Codex arguing about which games are good RPGs then not being able to agree on what "RPG" means.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
14
Location
Iran
Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects the senses, emotions, and/or intellect.
If we take that as the definition of art ( it's in wikipedia ) , then Video games are art because they effect senses, intellect and sometimes emotions in the best way possible.
 

Fat Dragon

Arbiter
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
3,499
Location
local brothel
Why do so many people even give a fuck if games are seen as art or not? What will it do for gaming if they're accepted as being art other than further inflate the already oversized egos of all these retarded Hollywood-celebrity-wannabe developers?
 

Jaedar

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
9,879
Project: Eternity Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Pathfinder: Kingmaker
Fat Dragon said:
Why do so many people even give a fuck if games are seen as art or not? What will it do for gaming if they're accepted as being art other than further inflate the already oversized egos of all these retarded Hollywood-celebrity-wannabe developers?
At least where I live, games being accepted as art would mean that instead of you paying 25% extra as tax to the government, you'd pay 9%.

That's a pretty decent cost reduction.
 

Silellak

Cipher
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
3,198
Location
Tucson, AZ
Misleading headline is misleading. I like to be able to bitch about an article without having to read it or even its Codexified summary.
 

Achilles

Arcane
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
3,425
VentilatorOfDoom said:
For us largely, it’s things like, things that can have an emotional impact, lasting, on the person.

Rape also has a lasting emotional impact on the person. So what is his point, that playing modern games is like getiing r.... oh wait. I see it now.
 

Archibald

Arcane
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
7,869
So, is Pac Man art? Sort of, I mean, in a way, in its simplicity it was, but you know, what we’re doing today is completely different.

Pac man is better game than any shit you have released in last 5-10 years.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
6,933
Ferdosi's apprentice said:
Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects the senses, emotions, and/or intellect.
If we take that as the definition of art ( it's in wikipedia ) , then Video games are art because they effect senses, intellect and sometimes emotions in the best way possible.
Well that is a pretty shit definition since it covers practically every creative expression, including childrens drawings.

Now you can define art any way you like, but when people say "games are not art" they think of the higher forms of art like really good paintings or good literature, not the baser ones, like BioWare games or pulp novels.

So really, the only way of making games into art is making the term so broad as to be meaningless.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
"Pac man is better game than any shit you have released in last 5-10 years."

No.



"Indeed, completely different as in Pacman had gameplay while Bioware's games have none."

No.
 

Zeros

Novice
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
76
Oblivion ought to be pretty artistic since it provoked powerful emotions like indifference and me wanting to throw up after fiddling with its gameplay design.
 

Angthoron

Arcane
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
13,056
A developer or a producer will want the society to view their product as a product for sale - a commodity, a "content" if you will, after all, they have tried to set audience's mentality in such a way for an entire decade.

Why? Well, simply because art is meant to be provocative, to a degree intelligent, and, depending on your definition period of art, it's meant to carry a certain responsibility before the society.

Which of these features, then, would the good salesmen want to associate with? Their purpose is to sell. To sell, and to re-sell, and to re-package and sell the same recycled, regurgitated "content". Yes indeed, their produce is not art - their produce is just your run-of-the-mill pop. Can we really blame them? Nope, it's their purpose, and they proudly state it.


Besides, according to modernism and post-modernism, art is where you find it, so I will kindly ask the good doctors to sod off. I don't need their opinion on what is art and what isn't.

Heh, might be one of the very few sentiments of post-modernism that I agree with.
 

Carceri

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,425
Location
Transylvania
Ferdosi's apprentice said:
Video games are art because they effect senses, intellect and sometimes emotions in the best way possible.

zevran.jpg
 

reaven

Educated
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
204
Location
Spain
Well anything can be art, even a wall painted with human feces, that doesn't make it better. The main purpose of a game is to entertain, if a game is more artistic or less doesn't make it better or worse as a game.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
Games aren't art. Neither are movies, tv shows, books, and so on. Only art is art. I sure wans't taught about films, books, or games in art class. FFS

:x
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom