LCJr.
Erudite
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2003
- Messages
- 2,469
Time for the educational portion of our show.
Typical furry propaganda. Trying to make people think it's a recent phenomenon and only a small minority are sick little perverts.
I personally think it's a stepping stone. Much like serial killers starting with torturing and killing animals before moving on to humans. One day you're trying to get your girlfriend in a fursuit and the next the family dog is walking funny and bleeding out the ass.
History and inspiration
Cover of Usagi Yojimbo, book 11
Cover of Usagi Yojimbo, book 11
The term “Furry†is used to describe talking and anthropomorphic animal characters in fantasy art, literature and other forms of entertainment. The fandom for these characters traces its organization back to a science fiction convention in 1980[6], when a drawing of a character from Steve Gallacci’s Albedo started a discussion of anthropomorphic characters in science fiction novels, spawning a discussion group that met at various science fiction and comics conventions.
However, many individual fans claim the roots of the fandom go back much further. Titles such as Kimba, The White Lion from the mid 1960s, as well as Watership Down and Disney's Robin Hood from the early 1970s appear on many lists of significant events pertaining to the birth of the fandom.[7]
Over the course of the 1980s, a gradually increasing number of furry fans developed fanzines and eventually began to have gatherings at house parties. By 1987 enough interest had been generated for the first furry convention.[8]
Sex and furry fandom
Differing approaches to sexuality have at times been a source of divisions and controversy in the fandom. There are also a wide range of stereotypes about furries and sex. Protests have been made by members of the furry fandom against what they regard as "distasteful, unrelated, or deviant aspects" of the fandom, in particular by groups such as the "Burned Furs" (a protest group of the 1990s who felt their work and image was being seriously harmed by increased sexual aspects within the Fandom). [23]
Examples of mainstream "adult" aspects within the fandom include erotic furry art, a style sometimes known as yiffy art (from the subculture term "yiff" referring to sexual activity or arousal), and pornographic movies of sexual activities between participants wearing fursuits also exist.
The term furvert (a portmanteau of "furry" and "pervert") specifically refers to the subgroup of the fandom that sexualizes anthropomorphic animal characters.[24] The term may be used pejoratively, as a self-referential joke, or merely as a descriptor.
Many furry conventions make clear that guidelines of conduct exist restricting sexually explicit material and behavior to appropriate areas and situations, since the Fandom includes people of all ages and interests. [25]
Fandom survey
One survey which examined social and sexual attitudes in the Fandom is The Sociology of Furry Fandom by David J. Rust, covering 360 reports (325 in person, 35 online).[26]
Rust states that in regard to sex:
* Furries "report a rather non-judgemental attitude" to some aspects of sexuality,
* the Fandom contains a large proportion of people reporting homo- or bisexuality and/or polyamory (or other non-traditional forms of relationship)
o In the survey, 48% of those surveyed reported bisexuality, 25% were heterosexual, 19% were homosexual, and 8% were uncertain. Also, 2% stated an interest in zoophilia, and less than 1% stated an interest in plushophilia.
* furries have "a higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity", and that
* heterosexual furries "participate in [mixed gender] social body language between members of the same sex without any apparent threat to their sexual identity as a heterosexual"
He cited these as reasons why inaccurate perceptions of furries may arise. However, the accuracy of such statistics comes in to question, for two reasons. Since Rust's survey required respondents to submit a real name and identification, and 90% of the respondents answered in person, the reluctance to truthfully answer some of the questions without anonymity may have caused a statistical bias. Secondly, the rapidly growing size of the fandom quickly renders survey statistics obsolete. This particular survey was based on data compiled in 1997 and 1998, and published in 2002.
Typical furry propaganda. Trying to make people think it's a recent phenomenon and only a small minority are sick little perverts.
I personally think it's a stepping stone. Much like serial killers starting with torturing and killing animals before moving on to humans. One day you're trying to get your girlfriend in a fursuit and the next the family dog is walking funny and bleeding out the ass.