Cyberarmy
Love fool
Second game and the Brotherhood exp.pack was the highest point of the series.
I remember watching a Unity free running video and was amazed because the player performed a parkour down move where Arno spin his body 270 degree which looks really smooth and badass. I played that game for 20 hours yet never found out about that move.better animations, (talk about downgrades Ubisoft!)
Up till Syndicate you could filter out what you didn't want to see on the map. Anyone with sense would just set the maps to only show missions, fast travel points and little else.Unity is the one where the map is littered with filler content like 500 consumables all around you and/or filler missions.
Very well done video a cut above most YouTube crap.
The video was interesting and educational and you are a dumbass with no taste for games.Very well done video a cut above most YouTube crap.
Spoiler: AC Odyssey doesn't happen in the past. Anyone sperging over historical discrepancies in a game where the Trojan war is historical fact, along with Atlantis and huge dragon beasts, needs to tone down the autism.This is not a shot at people with autism, it's referring to the video's author and his description of his video, where he writes: I hope you all enjoy my autism as much I want to hang out with Hippocrates now.
Not that I'm above making fun of autists.
But here's the thing. Whereas previous AC games did put on a veneer of historicity, any such aspirations have been completely dispensed with in AC Odyssey.
Historicity in AC Odyssey was taken behind the shed, and shot, and then it's corpse was impaled on a great big pole and people held a feast around it, celebrating the conclusive end of any kind of attempt at historicity in AC games. 'k?
The video was interesting and educational and you are a dumbass with no taste for games.
There are equally retarded youtubers out there claiming that "this is the most historical AC ever! It's the best!"
It's good there is someone to explain how things actually stood there, to the best of our knowledge.
Wrong again. Your position is that the video is "autism". Mine is that the video is "interesting and educational". The author has done research and cites his sources. From your side we get a non-argument in the lines of "I'm ok with a falsified version of history being peddled to unassuming brats, because it's a videogame, duh".My taste in games has nothing to do with historicity in AC Odyssey - conflating these things is the first sign of a mentally challenged position, such as the one you're taking
Wrong again. Your position is that the video is "autism". Mine is that the video is "interesting and educational". The author has done research and cites his sources. From your side we get a non-argument in the lines of "I'm ok with a falsified version of history being peddled to unassuming brats, because it's a videogame, duh".My taste in games has nothing to do with historicity in AC Odyssey - conflating these things is the first sign of a mentally challenged position, such as the one you're taking
If your vocabulary and general mental capacity was not already devastated by playing shit games, maybe you could have found a word like "pedantic" to use in place of "autistic", but I guess that's all you have to work with.
Anyone sperging over historical discrepancies in a game where the Trojan war is historical fact
Spoiler: AC Odyssey doesn't happen in the past. Anyone sperging over historical discrepancies in a game where the Trojan war is historical fact, along with Atlantis and huge dragon beasts, needs to tone down the autism.This is not a shot at people with autism, it's referring to the video's author and his description of his video, where he writes: I hope you all enjoy my autism as much I want to hang out with Hippocrates now.
Not that I'm above making fun of autists.
But here's the thing. Whereas previous AC games did put on a veneer of historicity, any such aspirations have been completely dispensed with in AC Odyssey.
Historicity in AC Odyssey was taken behind the shed, and shot, and then it's corpse was impaled on a great big pole and people held a feast around it, celebrating the conclusive end of any kind of attempt at historicity in AC games. 'k?
Wrong again. Your position is that the video is "autism". Mine is that the video is "interesting and educational".
The author has done research and cites his sources.
. From your side we get a non-argument in the lines of "I'm ok with a falsified version of history being peddled to unassuming brats, because it's a videogame, duh".
If your vocabulary and general mental capacity was not already devastated by playing shit games, maybe you could have found a word like "pedantic" to use in place of "autistic", but I guess that's all you have to work with.
Agreed. In general, I wholeheartedly approve of videos that try to inform the audience of how it really was vs. popcultural depictions, given that your average tard gets most of his historical knowledge from popculture.
Spoiler: Schleimann did find the ruins of a city fitting Homer's epic.
The Trojan war is a historical fact. I'm not saying like the gods came down and changed the battle like in the Iliad but the Greeks really did fight a war against the Trojans, right?
I have never, ever seen anyone claim that AC games were historically accurate.
This argument is about agitation-propaganda, and that affects a work whether it be historically accurate or pure fantasy.
^video sums it all up pretty nicely.
Diversity of skin colors, muh strong wymyn everywhere, modern portrayal of degenerate "free love" and homosexual relationships, re-framing of slavery, skewed representation of greek politics (mainly to include muh strong wymyn), etc.
It's all designed to make the younger players who don't know any better think that that was how it really happened, that 2018 sensibilities ruled ancient Greece.
And as I already explained, that is where the historical inaccuracy comes from: from their historical revisionism (everything outlined above).
This also gives leftists an easy way of brushing aside the game's "inaccuracies" by falling back on the "it's all made-up anyway!!!!!1" when someone criticizes the game's representation of women, for example.
Not to burst your bubble but what's with all this historical RPG revisionism of yours? Human women in 1st edition weren't allowed to have 18/00 in STR. In fact women of most races were capped at lower maximum STR than their male counterparts. You can even see it in computer games from late 80s - no need to go to 70s. Simply play Pool of Radiance or other Gold Box games.^video sums it all up pretty nicely.
Not really, it's some youtuber's opinion piece. Sorry if that truth hurts your feelings.
Diversity of skin colors, muh strong wymyn everywhere, modern portrayal of degenerate "free love" and homosexual relationships, re-framing of slavery, skewed representation of greek politics (mainly to include muh strong wymyn), etc.
I don't even
Was AD&D agitprop, e.g. in a Greek setting? Forgotten Realms, being a paracosm, agitprop?
Your claim raises more questions than answers.
It's all designed to make the younger players who don't know any better think that that was how it really happened, that 2018 sensibilities ruled ancient Greece.
The kids today think the Assasins were a noble secret guild that protects the ZZzzzzZZ whatever... but they were a muzzie cult and possibly the first suicide bombers. Crazy, stupid, fucks that were thankfully wiped off the face of the Earth. So, did you lose it when the first AC game was published, because it's agitprop?
And as I already explained, that is where the historical inaccuracy comes from: from their historical revisionism (everything outlined above).
I thought it was from the dragons, myself. Or perhaps it was Atlantis. I don't know where exactly I felt it was becoming ever so slightly historically inaccurate - of course it's still so historically accurate that people *might* think it's *real history*!!
This also gives leftists an easy way of brushing aside the game's "inaccuracies" by falling back on the "it's all made-up anyway!!!!!1" when someone criticizes the game's representation of women, for example.
Yeah what's up with allowing women to have 18/00 STR amirite brahs? Agitprop AD&D ruled by the SJW lefties since the 70s.