taxalot
I'm a spicy fellow.
Are we even sure this website is "official" in any way ?
Are we even sure this website is "official" in any way ?
Are we even sure this website is "official" in any way ?
Well color me slightly excited, before I notice the lack of the words "turn based" or "infinity engine".
Are we even sure this website is "official" in any way ?
99% that it is official.
I emailed MCA yesterday about the kickstarter for Wasteland 2 asking when Obsidian will start its own kickstarter and he replied that 'they are judging their options' and strangely he mentioned that he is expecting 'big news from Baldurs Gate soon' and ended with 'more news soon'.
Can it be that new Baldurs' will be made by Obsidian? Is their secret project and Icewind Dale 3 was a bluff ?
I don't want a shitty Baldur's Gate 3 by people that had nothing to do with the original, and Trent says something like "Baldur's Gate 1 was my favorite" on his Twitter.
I agree that BG1 in HD is the likely scenario here.
I mock thee, naive mortal. Verily I say unto you, abandon all hope or prepare ur anus for massive butthurt in twenty hours :doomsayer:Ah fuck it.
I'm hyped
I assume "interaction with party npc" means "ability to fuck an elf chick" ?The fact that he prefers BG1 (with almost non existent interaction with party npc beyond their quest, filler crap, repetitive low level ad&d2 combat..) over bg2 is not going to gain my trust though. BG2 was better than its predecessor on every front.
No offence or anything but the lack of retarded NPC banter was one of the good things about Baldur's Gate 1. The injection of "personality" into companions was what led to the new shit. When I play Baldur's Gate I want to travel around the sword coast smashing enemies over the head with flails and long swords, not play psychiatrist to a bunch of poorly written characters spawned from BioWare's internal D&D sessions.The fact that he prefers BG1 (with almost non existent interaction with party npc beyond their quest, filler crap, repetitive low level ad&d2 combat..) over bg2 is not going to gain my trust though. BG2 was better than its predecessor on every front.
And that's why I use multiplayer to generate my own party.No offence or anything but the lack of retarded NPC banter was one of the good things about Baldur's Gate 1. The injection of "personality" into companions was what led to the new shit. When I play Baldur's Gate I want to travel around the sword coast smashing enemies over the head with flails and long swords, not play psychiatrist to a bunch of poorly written characters spawned from BioWare's internal D&D sessions.The fact that he prefers BG1 (with almost non existent interaction with party npc beyond their quest, filler crap, repetitive low level ad&d2 combat..) over bg2 is not going to gain my trust though. BG2 was better than its predecessor on every front.
I assume "interaction with party npc" means "ability to fuck an elf chick" ?The fact that he prefers BG1 (with almost non existent interaction with party npc beyond their quest, filler crap, repetitive low level ad&d2 combat..) over bg2 is not going to gain my trust though. BG2 was better than its predecessor on every front.
As do I. Every time since my first play through anyway.And that's why I use multiplayer to generate my own party.
Yes, the lulz of playing with 5 Half-Orcs Fighters and a Mage is unrivalled.As do I. Every time since my first play through anyway.And that's why I use multiplayer to generate my own party.