Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Bioware on NOT making Baldur's Gate 3: "We have no regr

Andhaira

Arcane
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,868,994
http://www.videogamer.com/news/bioware_ ... grets.html

BioWare has “no regrets” over it’s much-loved Baldur’s Gate games, but admits it’s “frustrating” not to be able to continue to develop the characters it created for the RPG series.

Baldur’s Gate, released in 1998 for the PC and published by Interplay, was a high fantasy role-playing game based on the Dungeons & Dragons rule set. Its success spawned a sequel and a spin-off series. The final game, 2001’s expansion pack Throne of Bhaal, closed the story arc.

In August 2008, Interplay and Atari settled a long-standing dispute, giving Atari all of Interplay's previous D&D game rights, including the Baldur's Gate license.

Speaking to VideoGamer.com, vice president of entertainment and miscellaneous at BioWare, and vice president of Electronic Arts, Greg Zeschuk, said that the development of the upcoming Dragon Age: Origins, described by the company as “the spiritual successor to Baldur’s Gate” (head over to our game page for more), was in part due to BioWare’s inability to create Baldur’s Gate 3.

“The Baldur's Gate and Dungeons and Dragons property is of course controlled by Atari, and owned originally by Hasbro, so it's a complicated, convoluted way of getting there. For us it's more a function of... because we weren't in a position to do Baldur's Gate... hey well let's create our own! That's effectively what this [Dragon Age: Origins] is. It's funny, we took a page from Fallout, not Fallout 3 but Fallout 1. Fallout 1 was basically a game called Wasteland - that was the spiritual successor to Wasteland.”

When asked if BioWare would have liked to have made Baldur's 3 if it had had the opportunity, Zeschuk replied: “Maybe. The things we miss more than anything else are some of the characters we created. It's frustrating – like Minsc and some of the other characters we built over the years – not being able to continue to stem that is a bit frustrating. Though, to be fair, we feel like we closed the series.

“There are a lot of video games that – like the original Wasteland - never had a sequel, but there are a lot of games that never actually end. Whatever happens, they're left hanging and fans are like, ah I wish I'd finished it. But because we were able to finish the sequence of games in Baldur's Gate: Throne of Bhaal... it's funny, we were satisfied that we were able to deliver that entire arc. Go 'there it is and that's the story of Baldur's Gate'. We feel like we finished our work at that time.”

So no regrets then?

“No, we don't have regrets.”

In December last year then Infogrames president Phil Harrison said that Atari plans to revisit the likes of Baldur’s Gate, Dungeons & Dragons and Neverwinter Nights (originally a BioWare game), but not in the next 12 months. No mention has since been made of those games.

Discuss!!
 

Ancient

Erudite
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,173
Location
Bubiai
ofc not they want to make their own fantasy world (DA) that is on level with Tolkien :smug:
 

Erebus

Arcane
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
4,780
I still don't get what BG3 could have been about (aside from name recognition).
 

pero

Novice
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
54
Why would they have "regrets" about something they had no choice in?

As for them not making a 3, good. The series was over.
 

KalosKagathos

Learned
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Messages
1,988
Location
Russia
Re: Bioware on NOT making Baldur's Gate 3: "We have no

BioWare has “no regrets” over it’s much-loved Baldur’s Gate games, but admits it’s “frustrating” not to be able to continue to develop the characters it created for the RPG series.
Is that why they keep recycling BG characters in their other games?
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
No, no, they don't.

And, there are tons of things that could be done with a BG3 story wise. Use your fuckin' imaginations, dumbfuckz.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,266
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA
Bullshit.

poster20206144ux6.jpg
 

serch

Magister
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
1,391
Location
Behind mistary, in front of conspirancy
I'm pretty sure Wizards would love to have a 4ed D&D game by now, but all the fight with Atari is making the matter complicated. Pity that Atari didn't lose the license in the end and manage to secure the rights for that OMG. I also think that Baldur's Gate 3 will be announced relatively soon, given that at the end of 2008 they spoke of this: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/atari-to-revisit-baldurs-test-drive


Atari plans to revisit the likes of Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, Neverwinter Nights and Test Drive Unlimited, but not in the next 12 months.

"You will hear more from these but not today, because we're focused on 2009," Infogrames president Phil Harrison told hacks assembled at a press event this afternoon

So the next announcement could be Baldur's Gate or Test Drive.
 

Sceptic

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
10,874
Divinity: Original Sin
Jaesun said:
Bad exemple. Sky is nothing like Anomen and Kaidan is far less annoying than Carth, despite sharing the same VA.

A much better one would be Imoen/Mission/Dawn Sky/Liara/Leliana.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
"A much better one would be Imoen/Mission/Dawn Sky/Liara/Leliana."

Outside of beyond you female 'rogue' types, they are no more similiar than other young females. *shrug*

Their similarities are superficial.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,286
Location
Ingrija
Re: Bioware on NOT making Baldur's Gate 3: "We have no

KalosKagathos said:
Is that why they keep recycling BG characters in their other games?

They keep developing them, hey!
 

Suchy

Arcane
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
6,032
Location
Potatoland
They could just refactor some character names, places, and part of the world lore from upcoming DA2 and rename the game to BG3.
 

Lockkaliber

Magister
Patron
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
2,542
Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2 Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Volourn said:
Their similarities are superficial.

Bios characters are so superficial that often, those superficial characteristics they share are the only characteristics they have.
 

waywardOne

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Messages
2,318
baldur's gate was finished. the MC was either a god, dead, or forgotten.

i'm glad they lost the license and were forced to fuck up an entirely new IP.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom