Avu said:
What can I say I'm a communist at heart.
Well, so you're either a naive young man or a failed-at-life-but-is-on-denial old man. That's a good start.
No replay value=> no point in keeping the game => selling it
go figure
No
Most people sell their games after finishing it, no matter the possible replaying value. In fact, most people won't replay a game unless it gives you stuff on a second run (ME makes people play it twice by giving Shepard a new skill on a second play, to give a recent example). The obvious result is that people will see the discs sitting there, and will pass them on. Most people aren't codexers with shelves full of their favorite games. They aren't gonna keep trying a game with different character builds over the years.
Fact is some people do keep their games if they are worth it.
The majority do not, as said. No company is going to sell mainly to the tiny percent of players, unless they're a niche company already.
One problem is they are selling them to the retarded console crowd. Happens when you try to sell games to people that don't actually fucking like those games just buy them because it's trendy hip and all their friends got them too. Lack of quality doesn't help either.
Not all console players are drooling l337 kids with zero attention spam, but this is the codex so I guess I'm supposed to say "I agree, fucking mouthbreathers" to get my kool kodex kredits.
Everyfuckingone understands this fact. What some myself included disagree with is the method used to do it. If they could get away with it somehow legally they would forbid second hand sales. They just haven't found a way to do it yet. I suppose that would be alright too right?
Yeah, except that didn't really happen and instead they are just trying a reasonable tactic of offering you extra junk on a new purchase. You can't go around blaming people for what they COULD do. I have a dick, so you'll beat me up because I WOULD rape women if given the chance?
Oh I got his analogy alright just had to poke it. You make analogies to reinforce your point not to weaken it. Not only was his analogy weak it was also very fail.
But as he pointed out, it was faulty to begin with, so lollipops, I guess
Understanding reality and liking it are two fucking different concepts. I suppose if a company finds out it will profit by fucking customers in the ass with a big metal rod that will be alright too I mean they are a business and they have to make profit right? Think of the poor shareholders...
Yeah, except that didn't really happen so I dunno what you're on about. The rape thing above still applies, you're assuming they want to fuck you over for the lulz instead of making money.
How can you compare assrape with simply offering extra shit for direct buyers is beyond me. Don't merchants do this already? "If you buy these delicious fruits from me instead of the bigass market over there, I'll throw in another one for free".
Again apologists please burn.
You're a commie, everything you say is invalid by default. Like all commies, you get mad by the very concept of people being more successful than you.
the commie thing was a joke, crash burn zing pwned!!!
o noes !!11!
edit:
But do you agree that I am allowed to hate those people?
Sure, hate the buyers for their shitty taste or whatever. But hating the companies for doing
what they're supposed to do, i.e., selling, is stupid. Like I said to skyway, I'm not defending the
kickass game!!1!!, I'm saying that offering extra stuff is a p reasonable solution, compared to,say, only-3-installs-DRM. In fact, old games did this too.
Remember those games that came with cloth maps, etc? Extras to convince you to purchase a new one from them, instead of from your friend.
Yes, the friend may still have those things already, but most likely he lost it or won't bother getting them for you. If you ask him for the game, he'll give you the game, not the game + everything that was inside the box.