Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Bioware's no-homosexuality rule in RPGs

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
I realized this probably should not stay in the KOTOR 2 thread because it risks throwing it off topic.

PennyAnte said:
I got annoyed that Bioware games haven’t allowed same-sex romancing when they allowed (or rather included hints of) in-game sexuality. I think it’s discriminatory.

Quigs said:
are you offended because you're a homo, or because you just feel like taking up someone elses cause? What about the fact that handmaiden says she wants to fight unencumbered (which for some reason means stripping down, but still wearing a hand clasp bra, yeah, real unencumbered), but doesnt fight naked? thats descriminator against nudists!

Whether I'm gay has nothing to do with it.

In my opinion, if someone who is gay is playing an RPG and they are railroaded into RPing only heterosexual behaviors when the game has romantic elements, it's exclusionary. What if a heterosexual gamer was railroaded into homosexual romances by the design of some RPG? Same difference.

Imagine if Jolie the cranky old Jedi kept trying to cop a feel from a male Revan in KOTOR. Some heterosexual gamers would find it extremely offensive. I'm sure gay gamers also would find it extremely offensive if they're playing a male Revan and can't hit on the male Twilek in the Smuggler's HQ because Bioware has passed judgment on their sexuality.

On a total flip side, there are probably plenty of heterosexual male gamers who would like to have a female character in an RPG hit on a female NPC because they think lesbians are hot. Who cares?

My point is the game design is discriminatory, or at least exclusionary. I don't think your point about nudism is in the same ballpark. The nudity issue is a legal one in a way sexual orientation isn't. Indecent exposure is illegal, being a lesbian is not. I will say this though: I have no problem, personally, with nudity mods in "realistic" games like the Sims or Morrowind.

EDITS: Adds Quigs quote and a little more in the last line.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
Quigs said:
Too bad. Tell me, are there more black people in the world, or homosexuals?

Now, your not complaining about the fact that you can't have more black npc's in the game, or more interaction with black people. Why not?

Thing is, most buisnesses aren't stupid. They tend to have a target audience when they sell a product. The target audience in this case is young white males. The majority of young white males are not gay. But... to be fair, obsidian should have made the game about a bunch of black queers, because they exist too, target audience be damned.

Thanks for the new sig btw, good for a laugh.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
I think it would be good if RPGs had black people, when warranted, for example, if they're going for modern-day realism. Star Wars and Morrowind are fantasy settings with their own races. I'm not saying they should import Hispanics, Asians and others just because those people exist in the real world. I fully support artistic integrity. My argument is not that games need to fawningly over-represent U.S. minorities or the world's other races. You're setting up a straw man to attack.
 

Quigs

Magister
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
1,392
Location
Jersey
if you support artistic integrity, then why the attacks on heterosexuality? Clearly they presented what they intended to.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
PennyAnte said:
Imagine if Jolie the cranky old Jedi kept trying to cop a feel from a male Revan in KOTOR. Some heterosexual gamers would find it extremely offensive. ...

On a total flip side, there are probably plenty of heterosexual male gamers who would like to have a female character in an RPG hit on a female NPC because they think lesbians are hot. Who cares?

My point is the game design is discriminatory, or at least exclusionary.

Does this not already speak to that issue? Saying that I'm "attacking heterosexuality" also is another straw man.

EDIT: In other words, I'm sure there are plenty of people in bio's market, as you've described it, who want to see some hot chica-on-chica romancing.
 

Quigs

Magister
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
1,392
Location
Jersey
3 posts in a row by yourself, and your response is a quote taken from your first post? You just wont stop going around in circles. Just answer the questions asked.
 

errorcode

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
622
Location
Seattle
Vault Dweller said:
We definitely need more hot lesbians in RPGs, that's for sure.
ahmen to that....i feel there is a serious lack of hot lesbian roleplaying in today's RPGs.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
Quigs said:
3 posts in a row by yourself, and your response is a quote taken from your first post? You just wont stop going around in circles. Just answer the questions asked.

Quigs,

Those are largely posts copying your comments from the KOTOR 2 thread. I'm not a mod and can't move them otherwise. And I think I have answered your points so far. I support artistic integrity and I'm not attacking heterosexuality as you claim. I also don't think your target-market point holds up.

EDIT: That's because plenty of young white heterosexual males dig the lesbian thing.

What else have you got?
 

Quigs

Magister
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
1,392
Location
Jersey
No counterpoint hurts as much as flat out denial. Really got me there.
 

Diogo Ribeiro

Erudite
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
5,706
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Vault Dweller and PennyAnte seem to be the only ones thinking with their good head. HELL YES GIMME CHICK-ON-CHICK ACTION IN RPGS, FLANGDAMMIT!!
 

errorcode

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
622
Location
Seattle
i think RPGS should adequetely reflect a realistic society. Minorities should be there, just...you know...as minorities. But it has to reflect the RPG world that the game creators are trying ot portray.

Star Wars has always been a sorta Idealized version of a space epic. You don't have people being blown or cut apart by lasers, you don't have the gruesume effects of sudden decompression, heroes and villians are clearly defined and their place in the world is just as clearly defined. It doesn't delve into the sociology implications of homosexuality or of racial tensions within spiecies. Star Wars focuses on the higher issues, such battles between good and evil and freedom versus tyranny.

Don't get me wrong, i'm all for hot steamy chick on chick action. But Star Wars has never been about those types of issues.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
Quigs said:
No counterpoint hurts as much as flat out denial. Really got me there.

Quigs:

Where am I not giving you good counter points?

I have established that I support artistic integrity. I never said real-world races, for example, need to be imported into a fantasy game with its own set of races, like a Star Wars or Morrowind title. You said I supported having a game of "black queers" just because they exist in the population, even if the game is for white male heterosexuals. I simply never said anything like that.

I didn't attack heterosexuality anywhere. I just didn't. You said I did. What I did say is that plenty of young white male heterosexuals, which you say form Bio's target market, would probably dig the ability to have a female character hit on a female NPC. The accuracy of that comment is self evident, and is supported by posters here.

The only thing I'm saying is Bioware should let people do whatever they want (along gender lines) when there's a romance plot. To do so, in my opinion, increases player freedom and avoids being discriminatory, or at least exclusionary. At the moment, Bio's dialogue (in KOTOR) explicitly excludes those options.

EDIT: So again, what ELSE have you got?
 

Surlent

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 21, 2004
Messages
825
Roleplayer said:
HELL YES GIMME CHICK-ON-CHICK ACTION IN RPGS, FLANGDAMMIT!!
Bloodlines obviously didn't have this. What a waste of good jiggletech. :roll:
Troika should do xpansion/sequel only for that. :)

The thing with homosexuality, is that it doesn't fit into cliched epic story line where a knight saves the day and wins a girl blah blah.... and I'm not sure what ESRB raters think of gays.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
errorcode said:
But it has to reflect the RPG world that the game creators are trying ot portray. Don't get me wrong, i'm all for hot steamy chick on chick action. But Star Wars has never been about those types of issues.

I agree that SW's themes have mostly been epic, not about something like homosexuality. But I think in an SW game, Bio can allow more player freedom and not be as exclusionary.

SW doesn't say anything about homosexuality one way or the other. It doesn't judge it good, it doesn't judge it bad. It's not referred to at all. But SW does have romance as a subtext (like Leia and Han Solo), and I think in a game, which is meant to offer an individual flexibility in areas like plot and the nature of their hero (stats, moral choices, etc.), that Bio could stand to offer a little more freedom. I'm just saying they should at least open the dialogue options so players can use them if they want.

I don't think that would make the game be "about" homosexuality.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
Surlent said:
I'm not sure what ESRB raters think of gays.

That's probably where Bio is coming from. That and fear of getting sued by conservative groups in the U.S., or for getting negative publicity for "pushing the gay agenda," then having Wal-Mart drop their product.

I think that's weak, and a bad marketing strategy. Bio games have very clean, innocent romance plots that hint, at best, at mature situations. An overblown social reaction to having some of those plotlines allow for, say, three screens of lesbian dialogue would be ridiculous.

Furthermore, that's the kind of publicity that ultimately ends up helping a game sell, like all the negative buzz against violence in Grand Theft Auto titles. In the end, gameplay is what matters, and game companies also win big when they shrug off asinine social critics.
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
12,555
Location
Behind you.
Well, the problem with it in my opinion would be that if Jolie grabbed my ass, I should be able to hack him up in to tiny pieces. Since BioWare doesn't seem to allow me to murder my party members on a whim, that would be a problem for me. I wanted to murder Carth for stopping me from mugging a bum, and it didn't let me kill him for that. If he stopped me from mugging while fondling my ass, I would have really wanted fillet him.
 

jiujitsu

Cipher
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
1,444
Project: Eternity
I, for one, do NOT want anything gay in the games I play. I didn't have a problem with the way it was done in Fable, but any flagrant homosexuality pushed upon me (i.e. Cassius Curio - Morrowind) pisses me off and makes me want to vomit.

The whole Cassius Curio thing was kind of funny, but it made me feel so... naked.. :cry:
 

errorcode

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
622
Location
Seattle
Visbhume said:
And while it's true that gay love in epic tolkienesque stories appears odd to us, many classical epics, such as the Illiad and the Aeneid, feature homosexual-bisexual characters prominently.
That goes more to the cultural context of the times. When those works were written it wasn't frowned on for men and men to be lovers. It was, culturally, a non-issue.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,939
"That's because plenty of young white heterosexual males dig the lesbian thing."

There you go. It has nothing to do with BIo being "homophobic". It's about their target audience. Bioware devs have explained their reasonings for stuff like this numerous times.

As for female on female. I'm all for that. Probably the reason why I can forgive BL for its numerous weak points.
 

PennyAnte

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
769
Location
Here instead of playing an RPG.
jiujitsu said:
I, for one, do NOT want anything gay in the games I play. I didn't have a problem with the way it was done in Fable, but any flagrant homosexuality pushed upon me (i.e. Cassius Curio - Morrowind) pisses me off and makes me want to vomit.

See, even Jiu, who directly says he can't stand the overt man-on-man thing in-game, can deal with a Fable-style system. And all I'm talking about is something very similar for a bio game, just having the dialogue option there for a player who might want to use it.

I think there are plenty of gamers out there like Jiu, repulsed by homosexuality, but fine with having a game that lets players do what they want to do. A perfect case in point.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom