Best review evar!!1111!Chefe said:The review is up on the first page of this thread. It includes screenshots and a picture of me with the box to prove all you nay-sayers wrong.
Fixed.Venom said:I am utterly pathetic.
I just can't respect the opinions of others bevause they will probably not enjoy Oblivion and it is their choice.
I am an omniscient God that can decide how people should think and come to their forum to troll them.
HotSnack said:Now since I am unbiased I will admit there are flaws to OB; as a senior member of the Royal Medieval Arms Society, I can say with authority that Double Slash manoeuvre should be issued as "< > B B" and not "> > B B". IMHO I blame all those bloody hollywood movies which show off the Double Slash as some kind of show-boaty "> > B B" when it was historically a quick and efficient "< > B B" that aimed straight for the opponent's solar plexus.
Spacemoose said:How much was your dignity worth huh?
Klinn said:Heh, this thread got some attention over at TES forums before being locked:
http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/inde ... pic=270119
To provide some context, the originator of that thread has also written posts bragging about getting 3DSMax, Bryce, Maya for free, so no doubt he's following Ob copy protection discussions closely.
Ah yes, he "clarified" his post by erasing it, not by explaining what he meant. Uh-huh. It was pretty clear he was just trying to cover his tracks. By the way, he originally listed 'Zbrush - $0' in his post, doesn't sound bought to me.Rew_Klip said:Klinn said:Heh, this thread got some attention over at TES forums before being locked:
http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/inde ... pic=270119
To provide some context, the originator of that thread has also written posts bragging about getting 3DSMax, Bryce, Maya for free, so no doubt he's following Ob copy protection discussions closely.
The person in question did not get any of those programs for free. He bought Zbrush 2.00, and the rest was just wishfull thinking. He was talking about 3DS Max, Zbrush 2.00, and Houdni. Get your facts straight. I'm pretty sure he clarified what he meant later on in the thread.
He explained it later on in the thread dumbass.Klinn said:Ah yes, he "clarified" his post by erasing it, not by explaining what he meant. Uh-huh. It was pretty clear he was just trying to cover his tracks. By the way, he originally listed 'Zbrush - $0' in his post, doesn't sound bought to me.Rew_Klip said:Klinn said:Heh, this thread got some attention over at TES forums before being locked:
http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/inde ... pic=270119
To provide some context, the originator of that thread has also written posts bragging about getting 3DSMax, Bryce, Maya for free, so no doubt he's following Ob copy protection discussions closely.
The person in question did not get any of those programs for free. He bought Zbrush 2.00, and the rest was just wishfull thinking. He was talking about 3DS Max, Zbrush 2.00, and Houdni. Get your facts straight. I'm pretty sure he clarified what he meant later on in the thread.
Chefe said:The review is up...
Irwanday01 said:my only quip with the review is you forgot to mention the feature in Oblivion© which I am most excited about. Soil Erosion©
Rew_Klip said:He explained it later on in the thread dumbass.Klinn said:Ah yes, he "clarified" his post by erasing it, not by explaining what he meant. Uh-huh. It was pretty clear he was just trying to cover his tracks. By the way, he originally listed 'Zbrush - $0' in his post, doesn't sound bought to me.Rew_Klip said:Klinn said:Heh, this thread got some attention over at TES forums before being locked:
http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/inde ... pic=270119
To provide some context, the originator of that thread has also written posts bragging about getting 3DSMax, Bryce, Maya for free, so no doubt he's following Ob copy protection discussions closely.
The person in question did not get any of those programs for free. He bought Zbrush 2.00, and the rest was just wishfull thinking. He was talking about 3DS Max, Zbrush 2.00, and Houdni. Get your facts straight. I'm pretty sure he clarified what he meant later on in the thread.
Klinn said:Nothing too special in that thread, but for what's it worth:Pr()ZaC said:Thier board doesn't work as it should today.
Care to quote?
RussianTheifGuild said:Wow.
Anyways, I give Bethesda's install program a -1287913413412/10 because it employs Starforce and [censored] up my computer. I had to spend all last night re-installing the [censored] system. But I'm back and installing Oblivi[censored] again.
Remember, I'm doing this all for your benefit.
This quote is from the RPG Codex forums (go figure), and this guy (Chefe) claims he has the game. Whether we should believe him or not is up to you, I'll just wait for the evidence (of him having the game)
Anyway this guy claims that OB is using Star Force, I don't believe him and neither do many other Codexers.
What is your stance on this, do you believe him, and do you think that Beth has been lying to us about Star force all along? (I don't)
Let the speculation begin.
Last post in thread from a moderator:
Regulus said:We aren't going to discuss the claims of trolls from other forums...that and it has been said at least a couple times that Oblivion won't be using that form of copy protection...
I just found it mildly amusing that an obvious gag post here would be reposted as something serious on the TES forums.
Chefe said:Well perhaps you need to read over the manuals again, Doctor Doofus. < > is anything but an efficient and quick manuever. It requires you to charge up your < before releasing your >. The proper term for the quick and effective Double Slash technique is > >, two quick taps forward. It must be a while since you attended any RMAS meetings, because only a complete idiot would say that the DS move is < > instead of > >. DUH!
HotSnack said:
That is simply too funny. Considering how I HAVE READ THE MANUALS:
As you can plainly see, manuscripts dating back from AT LEAST 9000 years ago clearly state the intristic motions required to perform the Double Slash - and it doesn't involve "> > B B".
Maybe next time, little grasshopper.