-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Crysis 1, new and improved, now on XBOX and PS3!!!
- Thread starter baronjohn
- Start date
Deleted member 7219
Guest
Cassidy said:
As if graphics were the reason why consoles began bringing decline since Xbawks or mattered more than any other aspect for the enjoyment of a game.
You're right, the quality of the gamepad controls will be the biggest draw of the console versions over PC.
Here are some screenshots taken from the console version: http://www.gamestar.de/index.cfm?pid=16 ... =93756&i=1
Is it just me, or does it just look as good as on PC?
How can you explain this, Skyway?
Is it just me, or does it just look as good as on PC?
How can you explain this, Skyway?
MetalCraze
Arcane
Easy.
It still easily seen that the level of detail is much lower than on PC (nearly complete lack of grass, empty hills, same copypasted bush) and 100m of viewdistance (especially here http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/crysis/bi ... 50478.html )
7 years old hardware can handle that
It still easily seen that the level of detail is much lower than on PC (nearly complete lack of grass, empty hills, same copypasted bush) and 100m of viewdistance (especially here http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/crysis/bi ... 50478.html )
7 years old hardware can handle that
Twinkle
Liturgist
"Console" screenshots at 1920x1080? Ha ha, good one.
MetalCraze
Arcane
Obviously all screenshots for consoles are rendered on PC where the game itself is developed. They just make them with console settings. But yeah the resolution will be 720p to push out at least 30 FPS and no anti-aliasing seen on screenshots since that will completely burn shitty PS3 hardware.
On the big screen in reality it will look no better than that upscaled XBox360 Crysis2 screenshot.
On the big screen in reality it will look no better than that upscaled XBox360 Crysis2 screenshot.
Peter
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,544
Yeah, sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but Skyway is right here. Those screenshots are nothing to write home about. Crysis 2 actually looked a hell of a lot better on consoles than this because it was designed with console limitations in mind (judging from what I saw of the PS3 version when visiting a consoletard friend). Not only are these screenshots full of jaggies, have a small draw distance etc. but the colour is also absolutely horrid. They've stuffed the game with post-processing effects up the ass to make it look slicker, but the result is a really lame greenish tint that makes everything look ugly and dull.
Deleted member 7219
Guest
The console Crysis can't look as good as the PC Crysis on max setting. The PC Crysis had DirectX 10 support and took advantage of systems with better GPUs and memory.
But graphics aren't the main reason why playing Crysis on a console is a fucking awful idea. The main reason is that gamepads are never better than mouse & keyboard for a FPS.
But graphics aren't the main reason why playing Crysis on a console is a fucking awful idea. The main reason is that gamepads are never better than mouse & keyboard for a FPS.
Menckenstein
Lunacy of Caen: Todd Reaver
Why would anyone want to play an inferior version of Crysis when it was so bland to begin with. Holy shit that game was boring.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.