Wyrmlord
Arcane
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2008
- Messages
- 28,904
Apparently, that's exactly what reviewers are saying, claiming that every bad thing about Crysis is gone now. It's just had a few 90+ reviews out for it, and it comes out in 2 days. I was going to buy it anyway, since it's for $10 here, though without high expectations. Looks like it has exceeded them a bit, because
The PC Zone and Eurogamer reviews are in the same vein, as I checked. For $10, I would have bought Warhead anyway, but it's nice to know they took these steps. If this stuff is true, then this is very good.
And now there's a month until Far Cry 2. I know what I will be playing until then.
IGN said:Crytek claims that Warhead is better optimized than Crysis, and everything I experienced confirms this. In fact, what's amazing is that Warhead not only runs better than Crysis, it looks better than Crysis.
IGN said:Crytek reduced the downtime between battles to a bare minimum; you're often no sooner out of a fight before stumbling into another one. And sometimes, you might even drag one fight into another.
IGN said:And, yes, the alien battles in Warhead are a lot tougher than they are in Crysis. Gone are the short, linear sequences; now you're in the sandbox with the aliens, so it's a fast-paced cat-and-mouse game of shoot, move, and cover. The aliens dart around; they like to pelt you from a distance.
IGN said:Comments like that make it seem as if the Crytek had a chip on its shoulder, because it addressed almost every complaint about Crysis and then some.
The PC Zone and Eurogamer reviews are in the same vein, as I checked. For $10, I would have bought Warhead anyway, but it's nice to know they took these steps. If this stuff is true, then this is very good.
And now there's a month until Far Cry 2. I know what I will be playing until then.