Roqua said:
First the cliffnotes. If I'm reading your post correctly, you're saying that 1) this issue is symptomatic of a larger problem (self-righteous circle-jerk instead of actual discussion on RPG's) which needs to be combated rather than the symptoms and 2) there are other symptoms just as worthy of being combated.
Re: Piracy: I've PM'd people to not do that stuff in the past (and have edited out links), but you're right, we've grown lenient in that over the past two years or so. Not a bad idea to take a more rigorous stance on editing out warez links.
Re: sophomoric stuff / fundamental reasons: Unfortunately, I have no idea where to begin in combating this. I don't think it's quite as bad as you make it out to be though.
Basically, we can't turn any problems you mentioned - perceived or otherwise - around overnight, and need to tread lightly to avoid wrecking what made this site worthwhile to begin with. I don't believe the solution you propose - a harsher, more honest reaction to any and all who sprout sycophantic crap - is possible to implement or force upon this forum by the management. The obvious way to start, for me, is to crack down on the symptoms most easiliy identified. This is one of them.
By the way, chalk me up with the "rarely plays RPG's" (or other games) crowd; the reason I stick around is, well, I have trouble letting go of stuff I helped build. But then again, you don't see me going around claiming I'm some kind of expert, so I guess the shoe doesn't quite fit. For me personally, RPG Codex has always been about one thing, and one thing alone: having seen how "professional" online gaming journalism works, I wanted to be part of an independent effort to do it better.
@Spacemoose: That's why we waited so long in doing this. We *do* realize that any kind of a harsher banning policy threats the entire "say what you want" principle, but felt that acceptance of certain crap crosses the line as well as annoying us, personally. Believe it or not, The Management (tm) would prefer the RPGCodex/Tacticular Cancer forum community to stay fun for *them*, as well.
@Obediah: The intention was not to crack down on jokes that are politically incorrect. The intention was to give off the message that we're no longer prepared to show the universal restraint in using the ban-button that we have in the past.
@Cronstadt: Nobody, as far as I know; I like giving warning that the rules have changed before banning. I also like making blanket statements such as this rather than PM'ing back and forth with people.
Nedrah said:
I agree with the racist-idiot baning, but...
What about people calling us poor germans nazis for nothing? Will they be banned, too?
Depends.
"Nedrah, you gestapo scumbag, (reaction to post)" -> not grounds for ban.
"Fruity theory on how Germany is poised to erupt in 21st century Fourth Reich goodness" -> might be grounds for ban.