Why even bother with body-tight outfits then? Being naked offers same protection level, but higher mobility and better visibility.Chaimal bikini is an old and stupid trope. If you want mobility and all curves visible, body-tight outfits are the answer.
Good question. Something should be left to one's fantasy I reckonWhy even bother with body-tight outfits then?
There is nothing wrong with a pixie wielding a claymore. NOTHING!!!Curious how often people will object to anything less than an armoured burka but say nothing about retarded weapon sizes. Talk about immersion breaking.
There is nothing wrong with a pixie wielding a claymore. NOTHING!!!Curious how often people will object to anything less than an armoured burka but say nothing about retarded weapon sizes. Talk about immersion breaking.
Ex-Blizzard dev is frustrated with the remaster.
Mark Kern said:Diablo 2: Resurrected is censored. Which is ridiculous. D2 was always about being adult, edgy, dark and, yes, even a little bit sexualized. It's a raw fantasy setting. Gothic and extreme. To change it is to make a different game. Stop buying AAA endless remakes. Go indie.
The Amazon was always revealing. In fact, we fought hard to keep it that way as part of the them, as there was some push to change it, even back then. Sucks to see something we fought for get erased in a souless, corporate remaster.
The deliberate, hard won, creative decision to have an adult, dark fantasy content has had its sharp corners rounded off and made safe for who, exactly? This is a complete erasure of the original intent of the creators.
But in the end, that just makes room for real, dark, edgy fantasy games that AAA game makers will no longer make. I look forward to the indies that will take up the mantle. Just pass on Blizzard of today. Entirely.
Can confirm this works. Playing atm, has all the classes unlocked too.
Ex-Blizzard dev is frustrated with the remaster.
Mark Kern said:Diablo 2: Resurrected is censored. Which is ridiculous. D2 was always about being adult, edgy, dark and, yes, even a little bit sexualized. It's a raw fantasy setting. Gothic and extreme. To change it is to make a different game. Stop buying AAA endless remakes. Go indie.
The Amazon was always revealing. In fact, we fought hard to keep it that way as part of the them, as there was some push to change it, even back then. Sucks to see something we fought for get erased in a souless, corporate remaster.
The deliberate, hard won, creative decision to have an adult, dark fantasy content has had its sharp corners rounded off and made safe for who, exactly? This is a complete erasure of the original intent of the creators.
But in the end, that just makes room for real, dark, edgy fantasy games that AAA game makers will no longer make. I look forward to the indies that will take up the mantle. Just pass on Blizzard of today. Entirely.
Wars aren't decided on physical strength and 1v1 melee combat though. There have been women warriors throughout history. Even if they are extraordinary cases (for whatever reason), our characters are also extraordinary.
Saying that women couldn't be soldiers is like saying that children couldn't be soldiersWomen were very rarely participating in wars and usually only utilized in times of desperation.
Yeah and people keep quoting and giving this scum attention. He just wants to associate his products with blizzard hate to perpetrate his scams. Iirc he tried to do something similar with steam vs epic debates.Isn't Mark Kern the failed Blizzard dev who had one failed MMO project after departing and only ever since remained """"relevant""" by commenting and virtue signalling in the Nostalrius private server drama? He kinda has that corpse leech vibe to him.
Mark Kern said nothing wrong.