Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Editorial Diablo 3 'disappointing' according to Bethesda Director

Mech

Cipher
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
635
I must say I am disappointed that Blizzard has stayed on the conservative side in terms of design with their updates to Diablo and Starcraft.

Being disappointed with their game design choices means they are disappointed with the entire game?
Apparently so according to the title of this thread. Then again posting fallacious titles makes you look so much cooler.
 

elander_

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
2,015
Mech said:
Being disappointed with their game design choices means they are disappointed with the entire game? Apparently so according to the title of this thread. Then again posting fallacious titles makes you look so much cooler.

You realise Merc/Pete that being disappointed with game design choices also means being disappointed but without saying specifically why in the title. Looks like someone failed basic English at school.

"Diablo 3 'disappointing' according to Bethesda Director"
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom