Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Do you prefer computer games to be more like a book or a sport?

Do you prefer computer games to be more like a book or a sport?

  • I prefer computer games to be more like a sport.

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • I prefer computer games to be more like a book.

    Votes: 19 59.4%

  • Total voters
    32

Gurkog

Erudite
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Messages
1,373
Location
The Great Northwest
Project: Eternity
i think what the OP means is:

emergent gameplay vs. handholding, which is better and why?
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
13,908
Why not both? I like different games for different reasons. There's a time for competitive multiplayer games, and there's a time for pulling out the network cable and just immersing yourself in a world.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
6,207
Location
The island of misfit mascots
Poll needs a 'neither' option. I'm very storyfaggy, but if you're taking books and films as cues for how to write a computer game (aside from the universal elements like character-plot-theme consistency, being aware of what cliches you're using etc).
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom