Volourn said:"I DO like the length thing - part of what elevated BG2 was the sheer amount of content, which gave a decent illusion of freedom even though the main plot was linear. But that content has to be thematically correct and interesting - Oblivion and FO3 have lots of content, but to their detriiment."
Meh. Of course, morons (including BIO) claimed that BG2 was 200+ hours which is complete and utter bullshit.
"Weird. Most folk say they can't enjoy/judge their own games (or any art/entertainment product) until years later, as they are too close to the product, too emotionally involved in it, and too self-critical. Bioware hasn't released it yet, and they're going on as though they are a reliable and unbiased critic."
"But who the hell claims to be a good judge of their own work?"
You are fuckin' dumb. EVERYBODY judges their own work. EVERYBODY. You don't think, say, a singer judges their own work? That's why they practice - to fix what's what is wrong and become better.
He has his own opinion. he thinks the game is awesome. Nothing wrong with that FFS. I guess you'd prefer he claim the game sucks like shit, and release it anyways? Your logic is pathetic.
But, hey, perhaps when your favorite singer releases their next album I hope it sucks and I hope that singer *knows* it sucks and releases it anyways.
You. are. L A M E
yes plz said:
SOME artists don't, and I can tell that for a fact. A friend of mine plays in a rock band here in Portugal and I'm friends with them and whatever, and they simply play whatever they feel like, record it in an album and sell it. The music is pretty inconsistent, if you ask me, but they play it because they like it, and they do.Azrael the cat said:Oh everyone judges their own work alright.
Emotional Vampire said:So... Bethesda can put enough content in for a 200 hour game, and Bioware can't do half of that.
DarkUnderlord said:Dragon Age must be going to suck very hard.
I take all the games seriously. I want a hands-on experience on all the platforms. You know, to varying degrees: sometimes I’ll focus on one platform more than the other, but I love the games we make. I really have a passion for them. To me, it’s work but it’s also a lot of fun too. I can describe the areas in Dragon Age, and it’s not because I’ve seen them from afar, it’s because I was there. I went there, and I fought this creature, and I had the best party ever. I just love games.
... I had the best party EVAR...
Dark Individual said:Bullshit, they claimed the *exact* same for NWN 1:
Playing the single-player game through from start to finish takes about 140 hours or more if you try to do everything (that's how long it took me, in any event).
Volourn said:"but they play it because they like it,"
If they 'like' it they are judging it.
Emotional Vampire said:So... Bethesda can put enough content in for a 200 hour game, and Bioware can't do half of that.
Weresloth said:BioWare says a game is long (120 hours). Huge outrage from the Codex as it must suck and be padded!
BioWare says a game is going to be short (40 hours). Huge outrage from the Codex as it is too short!
BioWare says a game is going to be medium length (60 hours). Huge outrage from the codex because obviously it was padded to get it to that length.
What an asinine thing to say.
What?Lingwe said:What an asinine thing to say.
Do you even know what the word asinine means? Here's a hint: stubborn.