Xi
Arcane
Lestat said:Of course not. I loved the sentence, so I posted it here.Are you saying that you utilize Wikipedia to form your opinions?
Hehe ;P
Lestat said:Of course not. I loved the sentence, so I posted it here.Are you saying that you utilize Wikipedia to form your opinions?
Ok I see your point now. Didn't think of it that way beforeDrunken Irishman said:When there is no choice involved in dialog it's better to have it has a non-interactive cutscene a la Final Fantasy 10 than to still require passively pressing x to move it forward.
ghostdog said:Then I've tried playing 7 and the story was complete crap. So Is the story any good here?
Guess who did the character design?OccupatedVoid said:lol DBZ art style
Xi said:A friend lent me this game and Dark Cloud 2 for my PS2. Haven't had much time to play, but for the few hours I've put in, I thought it had great art direction. Cell Shading works wonders for PS2 technology. It's very easy on the eyes. The monsters and animations have a charm to them as well. Definitely aimed at a younger crowd I think, but I still thought it was done well enough that my interest was peaked.
Not sure if I will get through it or not though. I tend to put in some effort here and there so it may take me 6 months to get anywhere. Dark Cloud 2 is similar art wise as well. I don't know why you'd do it any differently on PS2 technology. This is as good as it gets.
Also, Dark Cloud 2 is a pretty interesting JARPG. Not too shabby, I'd recommend it to anyone that likes this style. These games aren't as lame as a lot of them are. They really do have some charm. /shrug
I'm comparing them to FF4,5 and 6 and I enjoyed the DQ games more (especially DQ5 and 6 have a very good story). Although FF4 and 6 are also two great games.Keldorn said:JFC. Better than FF ? Holy fuck.
Special_Can said:I'm curious about two games that are supposed to be pretty good, but I have no idea: Rogue Galaxy(from the DQVIII developers) and Tales of The Abyss. I hear Tales of The Abyss has a very good and detailed story, and most of all no grinding! So, what are peoples thoughts on the games? Good or not?
Eh, generalizations. Might as well say that the Fallout series is utter crap based solely on Bethesda's The Geiger Scrolls: Fallout, then.Admiral jimbob said:I played two Tales games. There may be many more games in the series, but I feel quite secure in saying that the series is utter crap based solely on Symphonia and Phantasia.
pkt-zer0 said:Eh, generalizations. Might as well say that the Fallout series is utter crap based solely on Bethesda's The Geiger Scrolls: Fallout, then.Admiral jimbob said:I played two Tales games. There may be many more games in the series, but I feel quite secure in saying that the series is utter crap based solely on Symphonia and Phantasia.
No, they weren't.Admiral jimbob said:Weren't all the Tales games made by the one team?
pkt-zer0 said:Special_Can said:I'm curious about two games that are supposed to be pretty good, but I have no idea: Rogue Galaxy(from the DQVIII developers) and Tales of The Abyss. I hear Tales of The Abyss has a very good and detailed story, and most of all no grinding! So, what are peoples thoughts on the games? Good or not?
If you consider Oblivion to have a deep and great combat system, you might like Rogue Galaxy. Similarly, if you enjoyed Oblivion's storyline and characters, Tales of the Abyss might be to your tastes as well. "No grinding" in the latter translates to "repetitive combat devoid of challenge". Yeah, you could turn up the difficulty, but that doesn't make the gameplay any less broken, just makes encounters take longer. (On the hardest difficulty, the very first battle takes about 2 hours, or so). Though then again, I found FFXII to be low on grinding, so your definition of the term may differ.
So, if you're going to make an exception and play Japanese action-RPGs, might as well choose one that's actually good.