kingcomrade
Kingcomrade
FFTA was terrible. It was FFT, dumbed down. Most of the stuff that made FFT tactically interesting was cut out.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Dungeons & Dragons Tactics vid...
- Thread starter trystero
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2007
- Messages
- 8,021
Inziladun said:
Bah. I don't care that it doesn't make any sense in the story. I don't consider these games RPGs. I'm playing for the strategy and the judges added to it. Sure, once in a while you'd get a BS law like "No damage to humans," but that's what the law nullifiers were for.
Deacdo said:Yes, as it shows increadably bad tasteOldSkoolKamikaze said:
Perhaps! I can't recall the specifics as to why, but I just remember having more fun with FFTA than FFT. I didn't even finish FFT.
I still prefer the TO games to them though.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.