I realize that you were originally talking about how well the Wii U will perform in the market when you mentioned Pikmin. I just took that as an opportunity to vouch for the game series. Sorry for the confusion.
Heh, nothing to be sorry for.
Btw, Mario Galaxy is a great example of why I prefer to look at things with a "business hat" on (such as it is. I claim no expertise). It's also a great example of the "hardcore gamer" mentality and how deficient it is. "Hardcore" gamers belief that 3D is inherently 'more' (respectable, sophisticated, hardcore, etc) than 2D leads them to preferring 3D Mario, and believing that it is a system seller that could change Nintendo's fortunes. But the market, ie reality, says otherwise. Every time. 2D Mario sells twice as much. Hardware spikes coincide with the release of a new, major 2D Mario. It is a proven system seller. But the hardkor continue to clamor for 3D Mario and claim that a new one would make a big difference. It would, but only to them. They are thinking with their personal preference hat on, stubbornly so. This taints all console wars discussions on inferior forums (IGN, Youtube comments, etc.). They'll continue with their delusion that Wii failed (it didn't) because Nintendo abandoned the "hardcore" (they didn't. They never catered to them in the first place)
Among other "hardcore gamer" anti-market, anti-reality beliefs are: that the tech arms race can continue to accelerate and things will go on as they have for the passed 7 generations. That they define what success is, and their tastes are the majority. That only "hardcore" games are acceptable and stuff like WiiFit should not exist (Yeah, sitting on your ass pressing X between cutscenes is superior activity to exercise.). That they are different from the dudebros as far as the kinds of games they purchase. Etc...