Kaanyrvhok
Arbiter
- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 1,096
MetalCraze said:EA is to Bioware what the Spaniards were to the Mayans.
I didn't know Spaniards gave Mayans unbelievable riches while asking only low grade goods in return?
MetalCraze said:EA is to Bioware what the Spaniards were to the Mayans.
I didn't know Spaniards gave Mayans unbelievable riches while asking only low grade goods in return?
MetalCraze said:Half of the Codex believes that you can't divide by zero... Are you just as retarded?
It wasn't. But it set new standards before BG2 just as Fallout set before BG1.DraQ said:Except PST wasn't biowhore's game.Awor Szurkrarz said:Except that BG2 was a steep decline after PST.DraQ said:Well EA did deliver coup de grace with its trademark Reverse Midas Touch, but Bioware's history was essentially BG1 (90s oblivious) -> steep incline -> BG2 -> long, steady declining slope of recycled plots and characters.Alexandros said:Besides, if one considers Baldur's Gate 2 as the best game Bioware has ever created (or NWN like Volly), then Bioware has been steadily declining for the best part of the last decade. EA had nothing to do with it.
Combat was as awful as in PST. It was the same messy IE combat. Banal Shit Boring. The only positive side was that there were some more spell defences.MetalCraze said:Awor Szurkrarz said:Except that BG2 was a steep decline after PST.
How so? BG2 is a better game. Has better combat. And is replayable.
Another step forward for the prestigious magazine.Befuddled Halfling said:^Yup. And here is one (of many) where he blames us
David Gaider LEAD WRITER DRAGON AGE ORIGINS / DRAGON AGE2 said:Stage 1: Denial You refuse to accept the presence of X in your beloved game, or any game for that matter, and begin a bitter campaign to convince everyone else that it is the travesty you think it is. If you play the game, you are determined to hate it—and voila! You do! You hang out on RPG Codex.
But there aren't any parallels to be drawn between the two. Origin was an amazing company. BioWare is not and will never be at the same level.Daemongar said:At Origin's bonfire to celebrate their company closing it's doors, the shirts read "We Created Worlds." Just drawing parallels between Origin and Bioware, tis all.Andyman Messiah said:"We create worlds" was Origin.Daemongar said:I am pretty Bio's is "We created worlds"Volourn said:"by the gamer for the gamer".
Isn't this Interplay's motto not BIO's?
I'm sorry dudes. I've been playing BG1 (or trying to at least), and every single one of BIO's games since then is better. BG just doens't hold up.
Andyman Messiah said:But there aren't any parallels to be drawn between the two. Origin was an amazing company. BioWare is not and will never be at the same level.
Really? I never heard of those before.Excidium said:Blaming EA is so typical. Bioware decided to develop emotionally engaging experiences instead of RPGs much before being acquired by EA.
Don't they mean "hipster" instead of "indie" or did I miss a subsubsubculturual, larp-worthy gaming regression-revolution?Zomg said:Zomg said:Multi-headed Cow said:Golden era of gaming now is indies getting popular on Steam. Get a larger variety of more interesting games.
God, they have indie as a genre
everything is ruined forever
someone code a steampunk zombie nerdcute version ofscorched earthworms and put it on steam oh Christ tower defense metroidvania platformer yesssss
Severian Silk said:In order to compete with Bethesda, BioWare needs to buy the rights to Arcanum.
J1M said:Another step forward for the prestigious magazine.Befuddled Halfling said:^Yup. And here is one (of many) where he blames us
David Gaider LEAD WRITER DRAGON AGE ORIGINS / DRAGON AGE2 said:Stage 1: Denial You refuse to accept the presence of X in your beloved game, or any game for that matter, and begin a bitter campaign to convince everyone else that it is the travesty you think it is. If you play the game, you are determined to hate it—and voila! You do! You hang out on RPG Codex.
Kaanyrvhok said:lol...
I'm just providing the dumb hollywood analogy after watching Apocalypto. From that perspect I would agree that Bioware was already in a bad way.I thought Origins was their worse offering. You can pin much of this on EA. Again I'm no fan of Origins but the changes from Origins to DA 2 were that of the out of touch overanlyzations of greedy marketing 'experts'.
l3loodAngel said:Kaanyrvhok said:Again I'm no fan of Origins but the changes from Origins to DA 2 were that of the out of touch overanlyzations of greedy marketing 'experts'.
No not rly. They just reduced the time frame. Origins took how much to make? 5 years. Now DA2 took much less to make, because yeah EA was greedy,
Befuddled Halfling said:These were all strategic decisions of the marketing 'experts', nothing to do with time pressure.
They both started out with a strong leader, produced some good stuff early on, were bought by EA, produced shit by their own choices or a stronger focus on marketing. There are more parallels than a lot of RPG developers contrasted.Andyman Messiah said:But there aren't any parallels to be drawn between the two. Origin was an amazing company. BioWare is not and will never be at the same level.
Jaesun said:Befuddled Halfling said:These were all strategic decisions of the marketing 'experts', nothing to do with time pressure.
They were?
Befuddled Halfling said:More cinematics, fewer useful stats, fewer skills and spells, fewer diverging story lines, 100% voice acting, silly little emoticons in a limited dialog wheel etc. And the story went from being cliched trite Origins to insane juvenile
Jigawatt said:Off topic (frankly I don't give a shit about either EA or Bioware)
MetalCraze said:Half of the Codex believes that you can't divide by zero... Are you just as retarded?
Do you realise your signature makes you look completely retarded (I mean more so than the posts that go with it)?
Awor Szurkrarz said:Combat was as awful as in PST. It was the same messy IE combat. Banal Shit Boring. The only positive side was that there were some more spell defences.
So what?It had no decent stat-based dialogue, no descriptions in dialogues, banal shit boring retarded Bioware cNPCs, shitty Bioware Choice dialogues, no ability to initiate dialogues with party members, no ability to do stuff to people in dialogues, banal shit boring plot with forced PC stupidity, decline all the way.
Well JA2 is banal shit boring. Has banal shit boring plot, dialogues without description and even without text, no ability to initiate dialogues with party members, no ability to lick Ira's pussy in dialogues and do other stuff to her etc.Jesus fucking christ, I already see you gobbling up JA2 Reloaded and talking about how it's much better than JA2 1.13.
Why do you lie? You're not forced to do anything. You could make a beeline for Mebbeth straight out of the mortuary without killing anything except that one zombie. The manual tells you you can change your class to thief or mage by talking to people, so if you decided to run a bunch of errands/clear out dungeons for people as a fighter while trying to find the mage-teacher, that's your fault.MetalCraze said:PS:T forced you to play as a fighter for, what, 7 or 8 levels (1/3 of a game)? All while your stats were set to be a mage (because how else will you read everything in this book?). And there was nothing but melee combat. Thus you were forced to play as a shitty fighter in melee for hours.
And the combat never left melee scale.
MetalCraze said:Jigawatt said:Off topic (frankly I don't give a shit about either EA or Bioware)
MetalCraze said:Half of the Codex believes that you can't divide by zero... Are you just as retarded?
Do you realise your signature makes you look completely retarded (I mean more so than the posts that go with it)?
Congratulations. You are a retard. Although I didn't expect you will pass the test positively before even finishing reading that sentence.
his point is that 2/2*0 does not contain any division by zero and half the 'dex fails to see that, which his use of the english language conveys quite adequately.Jigawatt said:So what are you saying then? You seem to be suggesting the non-retarded position to take is that you can divide by zero (retardedness, I hope, is self-explanatory). Otherwise the stupidity is packed in the form of massive failure in the use of the English language to convey your point. In either case, things don't bode too well for your claims of being one of the less derp posters here.