Oh hey, I forgot to mention. At one point in the interview, Feargus says "we're prototyping stuff with the Unreal engine now". Is that Stormlands Reincarnated(tm) or something else?
Probably Stormlands-reborn, no?
We know they have 4 games. One is AW (Cryengine), one is Pillars 2 (guys we totally did not decide to make a sequel yet), one is Stormlands, and last one would be....?
FU: So, New Vegas just used the Fallout 3 engine, but what we did, what we used, we write…well, we write a little dialogue here and there <grin>, and so well, we have a dialogue tool, it’s something that we’ve been developing for almost ten years now. What we realized when we went into doing Fallout: New Vegas, for the time we had it was going to be hard to write a lot of dialogue. And it’s always going to sound like criticism, but it’s sorta criticism. With Morrowind and Oblivion and Fallout [3], the Fallout engine, the Bethesda engine had a certain way of doing dialogue, and they hadn’t gotten to a newer modern way of doing dialogue. We realized we couldn’t use their system to generate a ton of dialogue. In essence, what we did was we bolted on our dialogue tool on to their engine and then we wrote an interpreter between it which would take our dialogue data information and put it in a format that the fallout 3 engine understood. It let us increased our speed three-four-five-ten-fold in doing dialogue.
BH: How much of a pain in the ass was it to work with the fallout 3 engine?
FU: <laughs>
It's called "Stormlands." Take a guess.As long as it's not high fantasy
To pull off a good open world rpg, they are going to need a ton of development time and cash to pull off something possibly decent. I don't think they have that kind of cash, and I just can't see a publisher handing Obsidian a ton of cash to develop one?
Liked Witcher 1, liked Witcher 2... Witcher 3... mah God... so many question marks... so many useless crates with useless loot... hours and hours walking over nothing... mah God, they just needed to make an improved Witcher 1, why CDPotato? Why? Let OCD Bethesda lovers go fuck their goats and let us free from the BS.Witcher 3 was ruined by open world style.
Liked Witcher 1, liked Witcher 2... Witcher 3... mah God... so many question marks... so many useless crates with useless loot... hours and hours walking over nothing... mah God, they just needed to make an improved Witcher 1, why CDPotato? Why? Let OCD Bethesda lovers go fuck their goats and let us free from the BS.
Then you would waste even more time on empty forests killing level 1 wolves.Mah god just tick the button to hide those question marks and youre good to go,
If you don't loot shit there is nothing to do on Witcher 3 open world that couldn't had been done better on a smaller game.mah god nobody fucking forced you to loot shit all day long.
Your fanboyism is your fucking problem, not good gamedesign.Your ocd is your fucking problem, not bad gamedesign.
A GOOD open world cRPG would actually be refreshing.
And Obsidian actually knows what actual cRPG mechanics actually are.
It's Feargus. At this point, if the publishers haven't learned that you can't let him do interviews on his own if you want to keep something a secret, it's their own damn fault!Interesting that the publisher allowed him to drop this news before it was officially announced. Obsidian gets to retain ownership?
Alpha Protocol was their IP too, it doesn't mean they got to keep it.Finally Obsi will get their own IP (well, Pillars were before, but maybe they will make it good now. Not that Pillars are bad, just medicore).
They have a publisher, its in the interview. I wouldn't be shocked if its Microsoft again, though. Barely anyone outsources big projects to 3rd parties nowadays.
Stormlands. It sounded like the deal was made recently, they probably used a prototype on UE4 to pitch it.Oh hey, I forgot to mention. At one point in the interview, Feargus says "we're prototyping stuff with the Unreal engine now". Is that Stormlands Reincarnated(tm) or something else?
If they do, then it's definitely not a AAA project funded by a big publisher. They'd never put that kind of cash into something they won't keep. Could be something with a smaller scope funded by Paradox, Deep Silver, or something like that.Interesting that the publisher allowed him to drop this news before it was officially announced. Obsidian gets to retain ownership?