Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Company News Feargus Urquhart talks Pillars of Eternity 2 at Polygon

Deleted member 7219

Guest
MULTIPLE expansions for Pillars of Eternity?

Fuck yes.
 

Drax

Arcane
Joined
Apr 6, 2013
Messages
10,986
Location
Silver City, Southern Lands
Obsidian should have 2 alternating IPs: Release PoE, then make your god damned Noir/Sci-Fi intrigue RPG (obviously born out of MCA's glorious vagina), then you can do PoE2 and so on...
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,431
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
Obsidian should have 2 alternating IPs: Release PoE, then make your god damned Noir/Sci-Fi intrigue RPG (obviously born out of MCA's glorious vagina), then you can do PoE2 and so on...

Yeah, I'd like to see them doing two different projects as well.
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,350
The question would be whether they can raise funds to have two teams, however small, running on KS money & self-published products. The question is what the interdependence of revenue is currently like. Why are they doing Russian tanks? Is it to just keep everyone hired until another AAA project? Has POE ultimately been entirely funded only out of KS money? So on.
 

Deleted member 7219

Guest
Well we need an MCA RPG and a Tim Cain RPG. And let Sawyer make a spiritual successor to Darklands.
 

Haba

Harbinger of Decline
Patron
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
1,872,095
Location
Land of Rape & Honey ❤️
Codex 2012 MCA Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
Standard. Industry. Practice.

You're not a shitposter, you already know why this would be standard. industry. practice. Development leaves you with plenty of things you knew you could have done better and would like to change the next time round, stories you'd like to pursue.

Oh wait! But if they're talking about the second game already that must mean they're not planning to get any feedback once the game is released! Jesus Christ!
Standard industry practice is to assign people to another project, maybe an expansion, but not a sequel already, unless you're talking about companies milking franchises like Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed...

I mean, c'mon.... they don't even know how the reception will be, what people will like or hate, if the game will sell or not.

Obsidian is not a small company. They need to have the next thing up in the pipeline. There is seriously nothing surprising there, only the fact that they so openly reveal the fact. If the reception is bad, they'll simply cancel it.
 

Nihiliste

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
2,998
Would love to get PoE2 and a Pathfinder cRPG but I'd just find it decidedly odd if they don't go to the well for a new IP; seems like the most valuable aspect of kickstarter. Odd that to this day Fargo still runs the better hype machine, if he was with Obsidian you can bet he would have capitalized on the pre-beta goodwill with another kickstarter.
 

Athelas

Arcane
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
4,502
Would love to get PoE2 and a Pathfinder cRPG but I'd just find it decidedly odd if they don't go to the well for a new IP; seems like the most valuable aspect of kickstarter. Odd that to this day Fargo still runs the better hype machine, if he was with Obsidian you can bet he would have capitalized on the pre-beta goodwill with another kickstarter.
New IP's are risky. Fargo's Kickstarter success is all based on pre-existing franchises - Fallout Wasteland, Torment and the Bard's Tale.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
6,313
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Serpent in the Staglands Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Would love to get PoE2 and a Pathfinder cRPG but I'd just find it decidedly odd if they don't go to the well for a new IP; seems like the most valuable aspect of kickstarter. Odd that to this day Fargo still runs the better hype machine, if he was with Obsidian you can bet he would have capitalized on the pre-beta goodwill with another kickstarter.
New IP's are risky. Fargo's Kickstarter success is all based on pre-existing franchises - Fallout Wasteland, Torment and the Bard's Tale.

Obsidian's name commands enough respect that they can reasonably expect 30-50,000 people to shell out shekels for a new IP (I mean, over half a million people bought Alpha Protocol). They *really* should do a "Call of Cthulhu" inspired franchise and a Dune inspired franchise. Niches like that are the future of the indie RPG genre and staking them now would be smart.

Pillars of Eternity 2 is a conservative call.
 

Minttunator

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,651
Location
Estonia
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Pathfinder: Wrath
Well, PoE 2 is probably a slam dunk, but I have to say I'm not overly excited about this yet - I'd be much more interested in a new IP that's not based on a fantasy setting (a spiritual sequel to Arcanum would be my personal choice).
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,594
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
I'm going to play devil's advocate here and offer a contradictory opinion.

I think it may be good if Obsidian goes straight for PoE2 instead of launching a new IP on Kickstarter. Why? Because it lets them build on their experience and immediately evolve on the first game. inXile's "IP-hopping" approach means they're throwing out a lot of accumulated expertise after each game. They need to learn a new discipline, a new way of doing things for each new game.

So let Obsidian do their own thing, going for depth rather than breadth if you will.
 

Apexeon

Arcane
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
864
Chris Avellone as lead designer plus a development team with a note that says "come out in 24 months with something interesting".

DO it. Challenge yourselves. Stop recycling.

Stop pandering to the main stream mobile phone zombie market and break some rules.
If 4+ million flows in I would love to see what Chris would unleash.
Get the gloves off.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
I'm going to play devil's advocate here and offer a contradictory opinion.

I think it may be good if Obsidian goes straight for PoE2 instead of launching a new IP on Kickstarter. Why? Because it lets them build on their experience and immediately evolve on the first game. inXile's "IP-hopping" approach means they're throwing out a lot of accumulated expertise after each game. They need to learn a new discipline, a new way of doing things for each new game.

So let Obsidian do their own thing, going for depth rather than breadth if you will.
To a lot of us PoE seems like a compromise from the beginning. I was expecting Obsidian to really stretch their creative muscles with attempt #2 rather than just giving us more high fantasy RTwP.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,594
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
To a lot of us PoE seems like a compromise from the beginning. I was expecting Obsidian to really stretch their creative muscles with attempt #2 rather than just giving us more high fantasy RTwP.

Well, I don't see nobody complaining about HBS delivering a more of the same follow-up. Bigotry of low expectations?
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,350
I'm going to play devil's advocate here and offer a contradictory opinion.

I think it may be good if Obsidian goes straight for PoE2 instead of launching a new IP on Kickstarter. Why? Because it lets them build on their experience and immediately evolve on the first game. inXile's "IP-hopping" approach means they're throwing out a lot of accumulated expertise after each game. They need to learn a new discipline, a new way of doing things for each new game.

So let Obsidian do their own thing, going for depth rather than breadth if you will.

I think this is fine, but I'd like to see them do this out of POE revenue, and then have another team kickstart a new IP - or at least, a spinoff in the POE universe with some clear differences. Avellone written. Turn based combat. So on.

I also think POE2 isn't necessarily 'lazy recycling more of the same'. BG2 wasn't that of BG1 by any imagination. It all depends on how you do it.
 

undecaf

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
3,517
Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
Well, I don't see nobody complaining about HBS delivering a more of the same follow-up. Bigotry of low expectations?

Obsidian is kinda on a different spotlight though, I would say; through their personnel and track record.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
Well, I don't see nobody complaining about HBS delivering a more of the same follow-up. Bigotry of low expectations?
I suppose? I gave Obsidian more money than I've given HBS over two campaigns because I was hoping for something better than good for what is rpg-lite.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,594
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
The truth is that creating weird shit on Kickstarter is dangerous. Not for the same reason AAA publishers think it's dangerous - not because "it won't sell". It's dangerous because "weird shit" implies experimentation, iteration, pushing boundaries, which means danger of losing control of project scope. And when your project goes out of control, there's no publisher to save you with a cash injection.

Crowdfunded games that aren't Star Citizen are low budget, so they have to be conservative. Or else when the game comes out the hecklers on forums like this one accuse the developers of mismanagement when they see the results.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
Crowdfunded games that aren't Star Citizen are low budget, so they have to be conservative. Or else when the game comes out the hecklers on forums like this one accuse the developers of mismanagement when they see the results.
Well the converse is that hecklers like me will complain when they choose to be conservative. Pick your poison Absurdian.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,693
I believe Obsidian has in fact run out of money for PoE. It doesn't sound like they're working at a comfortable pace at all e.g. people request some feature and someone (usually Josh) is all "look, someone has to take time to do that and we're swamped."

MULTIPLE expansions for Pillars of Eternity?

Fuck yes.

Not a fan of this approach cause of the whole diminishing returns thing.

With any luck, they'll bring back Nathaniel Chapman and company to make a Storm of Zehir-esqe expansion for PoE.

Chapman works for Blizzard and enjoys it. He's never leaving.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,431
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
We are going to keep complaining about Obsidian until we get our Sci-Fi or Vampire The Masquerade game from them. One way or another... +M
 

Western

Arcane
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
5,934
Location
Australia
Codex 2012 Codex 2014 Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
To a lot of us PoE seems like a compromise from the beginning. I was expecting Obsidian to really stretch their creative muscles with attempt #2 rather than just giving us more high fantasy RTwP.

Well, I don't see nobody complaining about HBS delivering a more of the same follow-up. Bigotry of low expectations?

Shadowrun feels a little more fresh, I suppose the setting has a bit more mileage than generic fantasy, plus people are hoping for improvements to the toolset as well as the game itself.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom