There was nothing moronic in my statement because I commented the whole "ENCHANTMENT" idea, and that items can do all the magic for you.You're always complaining on this board about how people take your statements "too literally," and then you say moronic stuff like this. No, you don't need a wand for casting, but you do need to do something. If you're swinging a battleaxe, you shouldn't be able to cast spells: your hands aren't free, and even assuming your spell was solely a spoken incantation, you wouldn't be able to say it properly with the physical exertion of holding a battleaxe and fighting with it.
MrSmileyFaceDude said:Vykromond, if it makes you feel any better, there's also a skill-based penalty for casting spells if you're wearing armor.
MrSmileyFaceDude said:Vykromond, if it makes you feel any better, there's also a skill-based penalty for casting spells if you're wearing armor. And, of course, NPCs can cast and strike with weapons just like the player can.
Why? Just curious. What were the reasons?MrSmileyFaceDude said:Vykromond, if it makes you feel any better, there's also a skill-based penalty for casting spells if you're wearing armor.
Drakron said:Well rip-off a well know system (D&D) is a reason.
No, I anticipated it Be careful though, they outnumber you by about 19 to 1 based solely on forum registration!Vault Dweller said:Fuck, that was the first thing I thought when I saw "the fans are pretty nuts over it...". You walked into this one, kathode. :wink:
[looks around warily] Hush!or not since you live in russia.
DarkUnderlord said:WE ALL KNOW OBLIVION'S JUST GOING TO BE FALLOUT:BROTHERHOOD OF STEEL WITH SPELLS!
kathode said:The fans are pretty nuts over it on our boards, not that you'd care. Honestly is there anything we could say that would excite you about it other than announcing it will be totally turn-based and feature reams upon reams of delicious dialog trees?Vault Dweller said:Hardly exciting though, is it?
I thought that his fondness of that big-ass sword made Conan less effective as a spell caster, rather than some artificial restrictions. There is a number of ways to deal with the armor&defense spells combo without applying penalties to spellcasting.MrSmileyFaceDude said:Vault Dweller -- it's part of balancing the class archetypes. It makes Conan less effective as a spell caster. The pure mage would use defensive magic instead of armor, anyway. And the hybrid battlemage would want to choose an armor skill as a major skill.
Quality vs Quantity.kathode said:Be careful though, they outnumber you by about 19 to 1 based solely on forum registration!
Is your ego supposed to represent quantity?Vault Dweller said:MrSmileyFaceDude said:Quality vs Quantity.kathode said:Be careful though, they outnumber you by about 19 to 1 based solely on forum registration!
Thank you for your contribution to this discussion. You are an illustration to my point.Tintin said:Is your ego supposed to represent quantity?
Really? How so?mEtaLL1x said:Gameplay-wise, armor limitation is absolutely REQUIRED
It may be a one way out of many, but it's definitely not the best oneIt is one way to deal with those moronic enchanted dumb warriors.
MrSmileyFaceDude said:It's doubtful said barbarian would even have Tier VII Fireball available to him, let alone be able to cast it, weapon in hand or not.