Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Development Info Girls can find love too in NWN2

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"As far as I remember from the 3.0 PHB, PnP familiars are closer to being pocket protectors than to being NWN1 combat familiars. And if I had a familiar that could only be replaced after a year and a day, I wouldn't risk it in combat."

You remember wrong. There's a re3ason why familiars gain the ability to deliver spell tocuh attacks on behalf of their owner. Do you think they'd do that if they couldn't enter melee?

Familiars have good ac, SR, buffs, decent hit ppints (varies on mage - as low as 50 or so, and as high as possibley 100+).

A familiar shouldn't be a front line tank ala the fighter class; but it is no pocket protector.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom