PoppinBy
Educated
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
- Messages
- 16
That's bullshit.I can prove that he's a nice person.
Have you even ever met him face to face? I highly doubt it.
I'm sorry, but when it comes to proving something as intangible as a personality trait I'm not going to accept anything less than having spent at the absolute minimum several months of frequent physical interaction. Even then it is far too easy for a person to present a false impression of themselves, and this isn't something that people even necessarily do deliberately with intent, society works through people altering their behaviour when in different contexts to present a more desirable image of themselves and 'nice' is one of the most basic and prevalent traits to assume. Through the subtle variations in body language, attitudes, demeanour and so on someone can come to see through the shell a person builds around them and into more of their true nature.
Sometimes it's the little things, like the occasional snide comment that seemed too sincere that builds up an overall impression that no, this person isn't nice. Perhaps it's something larger and more obvious, maybe they laugh at a stranger's misfortune, or stand by with complete disinterest as a little old lady struggles with something.
These are all things that you will not and cannot notice through such imperfect communication mediums as voice or video chats. Maybe you actually spend a lot of time talking away with each other through such means but it nevertheless allows a person to always present themselves at their best. In a physical situation if something made someone uncomfortable their reaction would be laid bare before everyone else present, but over digital communication the person can just find some means to excuse themselves or otherwise obfuscate their feelings. Does technical difficulties with a microphone ring a bell?
And to cap it all off and expanding on what I touched upon with my previous response, when you play games with him you are both having fun. It is trivial for someone to come across as nice when they are enjoying themselves (provided what they are enjoying isn't reprehensible that is).
So no. You can't prove that he's a nice person. You can at best say that your imperfect impression of him is that he is at heart a nice person.
I presume you're familiar with the expression 'actions speak louder than words'?Can you prove that he's a swindler?
Assuming you are, have you even actually READ this thread?
What part of 'signing shady deals for personal gain and making pretty declarations that are nothing more than vapour the moment the goods are in the bag' don't you understand?
I'd say that there is indeed an awful lot of evidence that his actions are those of a swindler. A brief recap:
- constantly lying
- manages to profit, and not through accident
If there was ever a court case to decide whether or not Proctor is a swindler the only chance he'd have of being found innocent would be through proving mental infirmity of sufficient calibre that it blinds him utterly to the barest reality of a situation because he's spent three goddamn years getting nowhere.
Would I consider him someone for whom swindling is a natural course of action? No, he's not like Appleton simply selling the next snake oil (although I still maintain that when it comes to Greed Monger Appleton was actually sincere about what he wanted for it). I don't think Proctor's the sort of person who would actively scheme from the start to scam (though whether that's because he's more scrupulous or just less confident is hard to say) but he certainly IS the sort of person who will take advantage of a situation when the opportunity arises.
Well duh? This shit's better that soap operas.Until then you're just another person rattling the cages for more drama.
It doesn't make what I say any less valid though.
[I'm sorry for the excessive italicisation in this post, but that talk of proof just really ruffled my feathers.]