Diogo Ribeiro
Erudite
I wanted to be the most evil being in existence, but then I found coloring books and managed to apply my angst in better ways.
Wait, are you saying you come to the codex for reasoned, non-biased information?Kamaz said:I kinda start hate those newsposts "with opinion". Well, maybe it is feature, but it definetly sucks when SoleEx is bitching about game only because he dislikes its author for his very own and mysterious reasons. I would understand if you made fun of the game that has hilarious PR (like DungeonLords) or simply sucks (DL again), but putting your own un-argumented viewpoint with personal attitude not connected to the game in a newspost - well, that is "feature" I dont like.
Sol Invictus said:Anyone whose game has been in development since 1997 and has yet to show anything for it doesn't deserve a second glance anyhow, Volourn.
Dude, I know what mechanics and reasoning is behind the Codex. And I realise the concept of this site. But hey, no one can forbid me yelling at posters! If you dare to post your opinion in newspost, be ready someone disagrees. Why smile and nod head to everything that SolEx/Dork/VD post if I do not feel like doing so? Hack, I dont understand it wont change a goddamned thing but I am no sheep and I do not agree with everything codex says - they are fucking douchbags as well and their opinion is not the best one around anyways. So let them realise that because otherwise they grow arrogant and start thinking that their opinion allways is the right one.Wait, are you saying you come to the codex for reasoned, non-biased information?
Well now that you do know something about this guy, so you can't quite use the same excuse, do you still think it's worth looking at, you stupid cocksucker. Feel free to laugh at the tsunami at my 'expense' so everyone's opinion of you can drop a few more notches.mathboy said:Sorry but I don't see how developing a game for 10 years makes it bad and not worth looking at, sure it was stupid to announce it back then, but, since I know nothing about this guy, I feel it'd be worth looking at. Hell, if I'd make a game now it'd probably take about 10 years, and I'll be sure to laugh at the tsunami a couple of times so you won't play it SExit.
Volourn said:Who is Dork?
Fez said:Cleve is a lunatic. VD's game shows more promise and it hasn't taken a lifetime.
Ellester said:Nevertheless I would like to play an old school game, again, so I’m interested. Graphics do look bad, but that’s not a priority. But if this guys a psycho who’s taken 7+ years to work on a game, I have a feeling it will suck.
Sol Invictus said:Well now that you do know something about this guy, so you can't quite use the same excuse, do you still think it's worth looking at, you stupid cocksucker. Feel free to laugh at the tsunami at my 'expense' so everyone's opinion of you can drop a few more notches.mathboy said:Sorry but I don't see how developing a game for 10 years makes it bad and not worth looking at, sure it was stupid to announce it back then, but, since I know nothing about this guy, I feel it'd be worth looking at. Hell, if I'd make a game now it'd probably take about 10 years, and I'll be sure to laugh at the tsunami a couple of times so you won't play it SExit.
Ellester said:Nevertheless I would like to play an old school game, again, so I’m interested. Graphics do look bad, but that’s not a priority. But if this guys a psycho who’s taken 7+ years to work on a game, I have a feeling it will suck.
fnordcircle said:If Hitler made a good open ended RPG with lots of exploration, free-roaming, compelling story, random quests and lifelike NPCs, I'd buy it. Politics be damned.
bryce777 said:Most programmers are either pedophiles or closet nazis. If you take this attitude you better just sell your computer.
kris said:Ellester said:Nevertheless I would like to play an old school game, again, so I’m interested. Graphics do look bad, but that’s not a priority. But if this guys a psycho who’s taken 7+ years to work on a game, I have a feeling it will suck.
I loved many "oldschool" games, but there is not many of those that I would replay now or even think much of as roleplaying games. they where in the end just long "killfeasts" with some limited story within them (and I hardly remember any of the stories). When I was a teen I liked those pure killing games, now they hardly interest me if they are not of premium quality.
conclusion. old school is not the same as a great RPG IMO.
fnordcircle said:If Hitler made a good open ended RPG with lots of exploration, free-roaming, compelling story, random quests and lifelike NPCs, I'd buy it. Politics be damned.
I would DL it, I think that would be fair and just what he deserves anyway. :D
bryce777 said:Most programmers are either pedophiles or closet nazis. If you take this attitude you better just sell your computer.
you seem to have some pretty wierd view programmers or do you talk about yourself?
fnordcircle said:If Hitler made a good open ended RPG with lots of exploration, free-roaming, compelling story, random quests and lifelike NPCs, I'd buy it. Politics be damned.
Me too, of coursebryce777 said:It comes from having worked with hundreds of them. I'm the exception, of course.
Kamaz said:Anyways, dont have any particular interest in this game but one thing is sure - I kinda start hate those newsposts "with opinion". Well, maybe it is feature, but it definetly sucks when SoleEx is bitching about game only because he dislikes its author for his very own and mysterious reasons. I would understand if you made fun of the game that has hilarious PR (like DungeonLords) or simply sucks (DL again), but putting your own un-argumented viewpoint with personal attitude not connected to the game in a newspost - well, that is "feature" I dont like.
kris said:you seem to have some pretty wierd view programmers or do you talk about yourself?