Harry Easter
Self-Ejected
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2016
- Messages
- 819
Putting the Avellone - drama aside: when I read articles about how much money Obsidian lost before PoE 1 I was like "oh, okay. They really ARE bad businesspeople and it wasn't only the evil publisher destroying everything." It put some things into perspective.
I considered them my favorite developer, a few years ago. I liked the ambition of AP, F:NV, even what they tried to do with Dungeon Siege 3. I believed there was a smash-hit in waiting, if they would just do their own IP.
Then came Pillars 1 and ... yeah, it was alright. I also liked Tyranny and Pillars 2, but those games lack a certain spark. They are relatively safe, so to speak. Say what you want about Larian, but at least they try to do better with every game they make, even when it bites them in the ass timewise.
I think Pillars 2 is the better game mechanics wise, but I would have liked to see the devs do something more. Right now, it provides a good template for DLC's and they could turn the game from "good" to "a bit more good" like the White March did with Pillars 1, but that's just so ... safe. Meh.
I considered them my favorite developer, a few years ago. I liked the ambition of AP, F:NV, even what they tried to do with Dungeon Siege 3. I believed there was a smash-hit in waiting, if they would just do their own IP.
Then came Pillars 1 and ... yeah, it was alright. I also liked Tyranny and Pillars 2, but those games lack a certain spark. They are relatively safe, so to speak. Say what you want about Larian, but at least they try to do better with every game they make, even when it bites them in the ass timewise.
I think Pillars 2 is the better game mechanics wise, but I would have liked to see the devs do something more. Right now, it provides a good template for DLC's and they could turn the game from "good" to "a bit more good" like the White March did with Pillars 1, but that's just so ... safe. Meh.
Last edited: