Unkillable Cat said:
And my only reaction is to smile. History repeats itself, and we can't seem to learn from it.
My first cRPG was U7, and I liked it, and played it couple more times on Exult with the expansions as well. Now I like Skyrim, and many other games which are considered dumbed-down. Some of them are in fact so, but most of them are just reiterations of the same things in newer engines, thereby creating greater expectations (which they fail to meet). Note: I am talking about gameplay / mechanies / presentation here, not story - a good story can be gripping (PST) but it is quite futile to wait for a game hinged on good story nowadays.
Consider U7 and Skyrim, for e.g. What has U7 over Skyrim, in fact?
Spellcasting variety and system -> up for debate whether U7's is too messy/etc., depends on the player's conception of fantasy magic; but Skyrim's is definitely very underdeveloped.
Combat -> Skyrim wins.
Graphics/Ambience -> Skyrim wins.
Controls -> Both as fucked.
Writing (Not story) -> Undecided, both styles are simplistic and yet has character at times.
Establishing a perceived declining ( :D ) cycle here linking D&D, early cRPGs like U7, and then Skyrim requires much more qualification than just: shucks, I don't know why these newfags like these new games, must be like how I am so oldschool I liked U7 but there were still older-school guys who hated me for liking U7.
AKA: The undercurrent of misplaced elitism concerning age of games on the Codex sometimes screws up perspective. But then it's a very mixed bag and that is why I still try to read and post when new games crop up - there are still posters that are capable of constructive criticism.