Melcar
Arcane
Someone should make a graph of The Codex, detailing its incline and decline.
Crispy said:Suchy said:BethesdaLove said:janjetina said:
Jaesun said:janjetina said:
Melcar said:Someone should make a graph of The Codex, detailing its incline and decline.
do you realise your the biggest no life faggot in the world.Cloaked Figure said:
It's a work in progress. Any suggestion for improvements? When it reaches it's final stage I will start using it when arguing with people on other message boards.
Avu said:Cloacked figure can you please explain how come Oblivion goes way back to 2002 before getting back to 2006? Is the drop in quality so bad that it travels back in time? But if that is the case wouldn't it traveling forward in time? I mean 2002 was still close to the golden age. Me puzzled.
P.S. You should try not having 2 values on the y axis for one value on x...
I agree with aRPGs not causing the decline. But the problem isn't stagnation either. Or can you name any recent RPGs that are as good as those 10 years ago? And aRPGs are in decline, too. Stagnation would'nt be perfect,either, but a lot better than the current situation. The reason is stupid* devs making stupid* games for stupid* target demographics (read: consoletards).Melcar said:I don't think ARPGs caused the decline. As far as RPGs go, that particular subgenre was always the "mainstream". What is really causing the decline is the recycling of old RPG subgenres, plots, characters, etc. The Decline is really The Stagnation. It's all in your head yo'. By the way, the graph needs more bloom... and rendered tits.
Melcar said:Someone should make a graph of The Codex
There's no difference between them, it's a constant function, where the incline represents the interval between 0 and X, and the decline any value greater than X. By my calculations, X was somewhere around 2002.detailing its incline and decline.
racofer said:y = x^(-1) , 0 ≤ X < ∞
Yeah, well, it IS the Codex graph.peak said:racofer said:y = x^(-1) , 0 ≤ X < ∞
Fail.
peak said:racofer said:y = x^(-1) , 0 ≤ X < ∞
Fail.
racofer said:Also, if you look closely at my formula, you will see a disturbing revelation.
Jim Cojones said:Codex function that will satisfy all the Codexers:
Codex(t)=(t-t')+(t-t'')+(t-t''')+...,
where t', t'', t'''... - time of your posts.