Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Is the original Sacred any good?

La_Nague

Novice
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
9
It will take at leat one more year, altough 2 would be better.

And after release you can add another year until most bugs are fixed...
 

aweigh

Arcane
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
18,142
Location
Florida
Funny thing about Sacred... the first and only time I played it I didn't know what the bronze/silver/gold options meant, after you create a character, and thus chose gold because hey, gold is pretty, and started the new game. Little did I know I'd be getting my ass handed to me by every monster. They are around like they were on steroids, it was hilarious. I got a CTD then I quit, thinking it the most difficult Diablo-clone evah.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom