Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Josh Sawyer Q&A Thread

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,202
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Contrary to Roguey beliefs, Sawyer does not oppose all simulationism:

 
Last edited:

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,568
I never said he was anti-sim, he's anti-pseudo-sim.

It's written in the Book of Sawyer that simulationism is okay if you go all-out on it with no half-measures. I'm personally not interested.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,568
I'm actually grateful that Feargus is around to nix the low-historical-fantasy idea in favor of something that would actually sell more than thousands of copies.
 

Zed

Codex Staff
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
17,068
Codex USB, 2014
I never said he was anti-sim, he's anti-pseudo-sim.

It's written in the Book of Sawyer that simulationism is okay if you go all-out on it with no half-measures. I'm personally not interested.
"pretty simulationist" sounds more half-measure than all-out to me.
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,917
I'm actually grateful that Feargus is around to nix the low-historical-fantasy idea in favor of something that would actually sell more than thousands of copies.
Open your mind more, part of the problem with this sub-genre is poor marketing and connecting with fans. The Kickstarter-funded ARPG Kingdom Come seems to have overcome some of those challenges, and even has external investment (which is going to occur based on far more rigorous market-testing analytics than a KS campaign).
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,202
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Some Josh talk: http://jesawyer.tumblr.com/

enverxis said: I see you liked Wolf: ET. Did you play competitive or just pubs? I played a bit of it on LAN, good FPS although not my favourite style of gameplay, however I did like how it required good tracking aim, as better players who could get consecutive headshots for a kill shined. Played with/against some of those guys in CoD and they were good smgers.

I just played public games or LAN games at Black Isle. I enjoyed the pace and overall gameplay style of W:ET much more than BF:1942 (though I did play a great deal of BF:1942 as well). Unsurprisingly, W:ET feels “Quakey” in movement speed and how many of the weapons work. The constrained maps and all-or-nothing objectives also lend themselves to much faster-paced, frantic play than BF:1942’s huge maps and death-by-ticket-loss. Each class in W:ET also felt distinctive and strong in their own way. Even Medics could eventually turn into combat monsters.

ilitarist said: Is it me or even with 3D games like FNV or Alpha Protocol Obsidian still does sort of 2D games? FNV was much more "flat" than Fallout 3, you rarely saw enemies attacking from above or below. Do you prefer to think in top-down perspective?

Most of the vertical elements in F3 were found in the ruined sections of DC. When we developed the parts of New Vegas away from the strip, we tried to reflect the building style of Las Vegas itself, which is flat in overall topography and relied heavily on Usonian/ranch-style houses as it expanded. The Strip wasn’t the place to have vertically-oriented combat because those were population hub areas.

In retrospect, we should have partitioned the different neighborhoods of New Vegas into their own world spaces (data/load-wise) and found ways to emphasize more vertical elements. When we worked on the various DLCs, we did emphasize vertical elements much more in both exploration and combat.

datoska said: My question about New Vegas. Do you think about general idea reducing number of skills, but give them many ways to use and shift accent from skills to perks, giving each skill a unique perk tree (like Skyrim). Inside these perk trees you give player to choose specialization (brunching), like ability to better use pistols, shotguns etc. Furthermore to learn these perks you need to find teachers in the world, who teach you for skill points and money. Thanks.

I believe that any time you have an array of things from which players can pick to invest in, it’s important to make sure that those options get roughly equal, somewhat frequent opportunities to shine in the game and that they feel distinct from each other. There are a lot of different ways to accomplish this. In F:NV, I made the choice to collapse various skills for more consistent use across the game, but I didn’t necessarily succeed in making them all feel distinct. Guns/EWs had a fair amount of overlap, as did Melee/Unarmed.

In a game like Burning Wheel, the player is presented with a truly staggering number of skills (literally hundreds), but the system is set up to allow a lot of cross-skill use based on the Field of Related Knowledge (FoRK) system. BW is very well-oriented toward tabletop play and players are expected to argue for why a skill can be related to any given test.

I do think perks and feats are the place to make the broad choices feel more specific, but I think they are least interesting when they are stat++ choices and most interesting when they give the player new options. I think this is true in games like D&D and Pathfinder as well as the Fallout series.

I wouldn’t want to make perk access depend on finding teachers and spending money, but I do like it when games additionally allow players to gain perks/feats/talents by completing quests and doing other challenging things in the world.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,202
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth


Well, it's good to know it was a mistake! At least they got the Kennedy impersonation right for President Kimball.
 
Last edited:

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,568


Looks like Josh nixed that idea he had about an antebellum-era south fantasy setting.

He wrote a short story about it, put in an awful lot of racial slurs. :M
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,568
What a retard.

The Legion were supposed to be min/maxing-for-the-purposes-of-creating-more-soldiers-in-the-quickest-amount-of-time misogynists, not "LOL GET BACK IN THE KITCHEN" misogynists.
 

Drax

Arcane
Joined
Apr 6, 2013
Messages
10,986
Location
Silver City, Southern Lands
The Legion were supposed to be min/maxing-for-the-purposes-of-creating-more-soldiers-in-the-quickest-amount-of-time misogynists, not "LOL GET BACK IN THE KITCHEN" misogynists.
They weren't "overly misogynacistic". They were as hateful with women as they were with their fellow men.
They are slave-traders ffs.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,568
They weren't "overly misogynacistic". They were as hateful with women as they were with their fellow men.
They are slave-traders ffs.
yj7XfEJ.jpg


The writers used the wrong kind of misogyny. Josh wanted "What, why would a woman want to fight in the arena????" not "WOMEN CAN'T FIGHT."
 

Ninjerk

Arcane
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
14,323
If he looks up he might be able to catch the point before it sails over :lol:
 

Duraframe300

Arcane
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
6,395
They weren't "overly misogynacistic". They were as hateful with women as they were with their fellow men.
They are slave-traders ffs.

Eh, let's be honest here.

Josh may go at this from an overly SJ angle one of the main complaints even/especially on the codex were that the legion was comically evil.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom