Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Knights of the Chalice review

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,603
Location
Deutschland
Shannow said:
The efficacy of classes depends on situation, playstyle and character builds.
Of course it does.

With my playstyle my single knight was killing every major enemy in no time (elder dragons would survive 2-3 rounds) and could take a severe beating himself by the end, while my casters were running around like little bitches trying not to get killed. (The AI's attack focus on casters, the bad scaling of spells, spell immunities and the inability to pre-buff do not work in casters' favour, either. Just sayin'.)


Why do we even have to argue about that? I do better with fighter heavy parties, you like casters. Fine. Done. What's your problem?

Disclaimer: VoD and I aren't arguing this kind of stuff for the first time, for anybody wondering ;)

I don't have a problem. What about you?

You misunderstand me if you think I'm trying to convince you to change your playstyle. If you like knights, go with my blessing. I have played with 2 knights, cleric, wizard the first time because it's the standard setup and I know that the game is perfectly beatable with such a party (although I had major difficulties during certain encounters, as already mentioned: the final final fight, the fight with the lich after the boss dragon etc) and of course the knights were dishing out a lot of pain. But I also played with different caster-only parties, so I think I know the differences. And one of the differences is, that during a handful of especially difficult encounters having more casters is a major advantage.

The AI's attack focus on casters
is crap early on but can be dealt with eventually.

bad scaling of spells, spell immunities
Don't remember those. Want to elaborate?

the inability to pre-buff do not work in casters' favour, either
Not sure if that is that much of a disadvantage. First, the enemy isn't buffed either. Secondly, if you could pre-buff, the enemy would need to be pre-buffed too, which means you had to cast dispels and dispel doesn't really work well, considering that tough enemies usually have very high will saves and the DC of the lowly lvl3 dispel isn't all that high. Taken all that into account it's probably for the better to not allow pre-buffing.
 

Mrowak

Arcane
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
3,952
Project: Eternity
Terpsichore said:
The point is that knights are entirely useless during the final fight.

Define "useless". Mine managed pretty well in the last secret fight.
 

Wunderpurps

Educated
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
569
Terpsichore said:
The point is that knights are entirely useless during the final fight.

I already posted that I had no problem with those fights, in fact I did better than you did. Maybe you just think I am a liar, but since I'm not the only one to get these results obviously it's you who can't figure out how to make them work for you.

If you give a fighter long sword and shield and plate mail and choose bad feats then your fighter will only be good as a meat shield. If you choose a more offensive and mobile build then you'll have characters able to kill almost anything in the game in one full attack, and able to close with enemies very quick to get attacks of opportunity when they try to cast or move towards your spellcasters.
 

Terpsichore

Arcane
Joined
Aug 18, 2011
Messages
1,789
Location
why
Except when there are enemies with massive damage reductions and nasty reflect shields involved.

But don't get me wrong, the hardest part of that fight is keeping the npcs alive, a knight doesn't help with that.
 

Wunderpurps

Educated
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
569
Terpsichore said:
Except when there are enemies with massive damage reductions and nasty reflect shields involved.

But don't get me wrong, the hardest part of that fight is keeping the npcs alive, a knight doesn't help with that.

Well you get a two handed weapon and power attack. Then damage reduction is not an issue, and you'll be dealing hundreds of damage per round by the end. And remember damage reduction is ignored when you have the proper weapon type.

Or you can dual wield vorpal swords. Then you get some ridiculous amount of attacks and behead anything that has a head in one round 90% of the time.

And before you face guys with strong fire shield or ice shield your cleric, instead of acting as 2nd rate fighter or 3rd rate mage, casts the proper protection spell on your fighter.

That's all I ever did with my cleric in more serious fights, he was constantly casting buffs and dispels and cures in combat. He'll have Heal by the end so really it's very easy. Likewise in most fights your mage would then cast haste. Now your hasted flame protected fighter zooms across the screen and hits one dragon for 200 points and the next round it kills 3 dragons with great cleave in a full attack.

The complaints you have say it's that you're not using them right, because these just aren't real problems. Also, having just one fighter is a bad mix. You should have two or have none because just one won't be enough to act as your main damage, especially if he has longsword and shield.

I don't remember the fight details any more but I had zero difficulty keeping the NPCs alive, and that's going to be easier with fighters because you can just run them past the NPCs to draw monster attacks. With mages as your damage battery you have to just kill the enemy immediately to stop attacks.
 

hydd

Guest
Greetings all,

Wanted to resurrect this thread to share my recent rant of Knights of the Chalice. I actually found out about Kotc and a few of my other favorites (Avernum & Arcanum ♥) from RPG Codex. Discussions happen quite fast here and never got around to making an account. Anyhow, I hope you enjoy the rant!

URL: http://www.benjaminbook.com/
 

kieferd20

Ellis Studios
Developer
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
62
Knight is completely useless later on and the extra final fight will be a nightmare.

But of course, with a proper party and gear the game is just too easy.


Wow i take it you did not play the game. knights are not useless matter of fact they are the ultimate heroes. i am currently level 22 and my knights hit 6 to 7 times and do about 30 to 80 damage per hit.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,709
Wow i take it you did not play the game. knights are not useless matter of fact they are the ultimate heroes. i am currently level 22 and my knights hit 6 to 7 times and do about 30 to 80 damage per hit.

While "completely useless" is an exaggeration, it's D&D, so a high level two wizard party is going to trounce a high level two knight party.
 

kieferd20

Ellis Studios
Developer
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
62
Wow i take it you did not play the game. knights are not useless matter of fact they are the ultimate heroes. i am currently level 22 and my knights hit 6 to 7 times and do about 30 to 80 damage per hit.

While "completely useless" is an exaggeration, it's D&D, so a high level two wizard party is going to trounce a high level two knight party.


You are misguided for sure :)
I have played through the game so many times with so many parties, and knights are the rulers in the game! D&D or not!!
You people are idiots!! fat slobs that sit behind their computer and suck down MD and pretend to have a life.
 

Dickie

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
4,367
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
You can get to level 22 in this game? I remember the cap being 20 back when I played.
 

Zep Zepo

Titties and Beer
Dumbfuck Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
5,233
Tried the demo. Hard computer lock after install followed by a spontaneous reboot.

Against my better judgement, when reboot I tried again to launch the game.

It worked.

"Something something...search ruins...blah blah"

Got party wiped by a bear in the first 3 minutes.

Uninstalled.

:salute:

Zep--
 

Darth Roxor

Rattus Iratus
Staff Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,879,040
Location
Djibouti
Tried the demo. Hard computer lock after install followed by a spontaneous reboot.

Against my better judgement, when reboot I tried again to launch the game.

It worked.

"Something something...search ruins...blah blah"

Got party wiped by a bear in the first 3 minutes.

Uninstalled.

:salute:

Zep--

the dementia's kicking in, old man
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom