I consider the two cars now finished.
I timed them for the last time and achieved pretty spectacular results, especially with the Popamol which thereby holds the record at 1:36,5
LAP RECORDS 2018-06-01
Instead of sperging for hundredth of seconds, it was decided to work on basic research again.
I wrote a lot of crap about V6s and it turns out it was wrong. I received new information from one of the developers that taught me something important: that V6 turbo needs to be treated exactly like an inline 3.
Why? Well if you look at it, it becomes quite obvious.
A V6 is nothing but two inline 3s with 2 turbos at each sides. So apart from minor adjustments, a turbo can simply be scaled up from a i3.
And this had totally eluded me! Instead I had assumed that I should use the same optimal values I had developed for inline 6s. But that is totally wrong, an i3/V6 is optimal at compressor 62, whereas for the inline 6 the compressor went as high as 87.
With the 2 huge compressors instead of 1, the V6 gets a powerband totally skewed to high revs and it also had the largest huge peak power by the way which had pussled me (8:1). Now that totally makes sense. the compressors were completely overkill and began working effectively much too late.
Now with all that finally realized, I could finally think about working on a V6 (and V8).
And the result is very encouraging! In the following table you cab see a completely new engine, the
NV6, at the very bottom.
The engine already reaches higher hp/kg and perf/kg than the previously best engine (Popamol RSX 3000). ie theoretically it is the most potent I ever built.
It's just 8 kilogramm heavier than the Popamol but has almost 100 hp and 65 perf more.
Although that is only small progress. there is a lot of new refinement that could theoretically produce an even faster car. A bore stroke of 93x92.5 is a return to the old times, when this turned out the optimal size of a V6. This has long been one of my preferred bore/strokes for many reasons (in the 1970s it was called large V6) It has large displacement (3.8 L) a reasonable stroke (which means the engine can rev quite high without damage), and excellent power to weight and reliability. Everything is in balance. In general, any large square engine with 1:1 ratio is preferrable because it has no disadvantages.
The only snag is that it derives quite a bit from the 500cc per cylinder that seems to be the norm these days (BMW). But there is nothing that can be done, because I need as much performance as I can get. And I am only 25% over that. It also won't fit the Popamol chassis (otherwise I am pretty positive this would run the track in 1:35). It cannot compete against the 5L I6 Turbo in the Folgore chassis either, but there are other, lighter chassis and other companies who would want to take the lead again.
There are no cars with this engine yet but .. over 1250 hp in a form factor of an I4. In a small, nimble car like the Popamol this could be the ultimate increase in performance that could push the limit perhaps to 1:35s.
Perhaps. And though it's early, I think I might have actually found 1 or 2 chassis that could theoretically have the right potential.
But even another car that can compete with the two to teams would be satisfying, because this has stopped beaing easy long ago.
And btw, if I add this information together I already know that a 6L V8 based on the Popamol 3L would probably be the killer of all those engines, including the V6. But one step at a time ..