spacemoose
Erudite
I'm top gun
Vault Dweller said:Remind me again why the Codex stopped rewarding posting excellence with a special tag.
PorkaMorka said:Vault Dweller said:Remind me again why the Codex stopped rewarding posting excellence with a special tag.
Remind me again why a game should be able to get a high score when it includes a major gameplay element which is incredibly poorly done?
Arcanum is part good game and part awful game. That's not hyperbole, the whole gimmick of magic vs technology is ruined by the fact that picking magic makes the game trivial.
PS:T is part good game and part mediocre game. The combat is decidedly sub par and not particularly fun and you do a lot of it.
Fallout is the most complete of the three, especially considering it's release date. It's flaws are substantially more forgivable, despite it's flawed mechanics it was easy for people who played it to enjoy the combat, the exploration, the interaction *and* the plot, not just a portion of the game.
Jaime Lannister said:Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.
Relayer71 said:Well since Oblivion and Dungeon Siege aren't up there, it will have to be Arcanum.
denizsi said:Jaime Lannister said:Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.
How so?
Jaime Lannister said:denizsi said:Jaime Lannister said:Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.
How so?
all 3 games did story and quest design much better than they did combat
fallout has "best of the worst" combat, while ps:t and arcanum have truly excellent story and quest design respectively.
denizsi said:You should edit your OP and write that having played and finished all 3 at least once is a prerequisite to vote.
Jaime Lannister said:PS:T is eliminated due to story being possible in any medium, and actually weakened due to being a game.
Reject_666_6 said: