Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Let's settle this once and for all! Who's the Top Dog?

What is the Codex' choice for greatest CRPG of all time?

  • I choose Arcanum!

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • I choose Fallout!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I choose Torment!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

spacemoose

Erudite
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
9,632
Location
california
I'm top gun
 

PorkaMorka

Arcane
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
5,090
Vault Dweller said:
Remind me again why the Codex stopped rewarding posting excellence with a special tag.

Remind me again why a game should be able to get a high score when it includes a major gameplay element which is incredibly poorly done?

Arcanum is part good game and part awful game. That's not hyperbole, the whole gimmick of magic vs technology is ruined by the fact that picking magic makes the game trivial.

PS:T is part good game and part mediocre game. The combat is decidedly sub par and not particularly fun and you do a lot of it.

Fallout is the most complete of the three, especially considering it's release date. It's flaws are substantially more forgivable, despite it's flawed mechanics it was easy for people who played it to enjoy the combat, the exploration, the interaction *and* the plot, not just a portion of the game.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
7,269
PorkaMorka said:
Vault Dweller said:
Remind me again why the Codex stopped rewarding posting excellence with a special tag.

Remind me again why a game should be able to get a high score when it includes a major gameplay element which is incredibly poorly done?

Arcanum is part good game and part awful game. That's not hyperbole, the whole gimmick of magic vs technology is ruined by the fact that picking magic makes the game trivial.

PS:T is part good game and part mediocre game. The combat is decidedly sub par and not particularly fun and you do a lot of it.

Fallout is the most complete of the three, especially considering it's release date. It's flaws are substantially more forgivable, despite it's flawed mechanics it was easy for people who played it to enjoy the combat, the exploration, the interaction *and* the plot, not just a portion of the game.

I don't like you very much.
 

denizsi

Arcane
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
9,927
Location
bosphorus
I'm torn between Fallout and Arcanum, but I vote Fallout.

Fallout is complete in itself.

Arcanum pushed RPG design further but lots of stuff ended up premature. Lots of in-game promise that built towards an anti-climax of nothingness. Plus, with forced combat encounters by the bucket loads and no way to avoid them, it can basically be thought of as a broken Diablo with a personality and some C&C. I find it a terrible chore to replay Arcanum because of the combat. Not so with Fallout.

Jaime Lannister said:
Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.

How so?
 

Jaime Lannister

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
7,183
denizsi said:
Jaime Lannister said:
Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.

How so?

all 3 games did story and quest design much better than they did combat

fallout has "best of the worst" combat, while ps:t and arcanum have truly excellent story and quest design respectively.
 

denizsi

Arcane
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
9,927
Location
bosphorus
Jaime Lannister said:
denizsi said:
Jaime Lannister said:
Fallout is eliminated due to combat being the worst part of all 3 games.

How so?

all 3 games did story and quest design much better than they did combat

fallout has "best of the worst" combat, while ps:t and arcanum have truly excellent story and quest design respectively.

I see.
 

Crispy

I feel... young!
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
1,877,258
Location
Future Wasteland
Strap Yourselves In
Now it appears that Torment and Arcanum have turned on each other, pulling each other's hair out! While Fallout continues to hold both down with its mighty boot!

Can Fallout be topped? There is no second place, folks! This is for it all, King Shit of RPG's!

Ooh the tension! My nipples are h.. sorry. VOTE!
 

denizsi

Arcane
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
9,927
Location
bosphorus
You should edit your OP and write that having played and finished all 3 at least once is a prerequisite to vote.
 

racofer

Thread Incliner
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
25,859
Location
Your ignore list.
21cz5oy.jpg
 

Gragt

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
1,864,860
Location
Dans Ton Cul
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin
Well it does have the potential to be an interesting thread. Unfortunately it falls down into posts where people will prefer one simply because they haven't played the other, or will just let their preference get in the way.

Typical Codexity, then.
 

Reject_666_6

Arcane
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
2,465
Location
Transylvania
Jaime Lannister said:
PS:T is eliminated due to story being possible in any medium, and actually weakened due to being a game.

Bullshit. I'll give you that PS:T could easily have been designed as an adventure game and be just as good, if not better because then there would be no combat to criticise, but there's no way you could transpose that whole story into ANY other non-interactive medium. Have you read the novelization of the game? Terrible, horrible, banal shit boring. Make a film?

PSTohgodno.jpg


No. A play? Forsooth, oh nameless one! I'm afraid it's stuck as a computer game, which most people here would agree with and prefer over all the others.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"If it's not the best RPG ever made, it's one of the top 3."

No, it isn't. I remember a time where I had to defend ARC her eon the Codex, and now all of asudden it's some maste rgame? WTF?

ARC is a fantastic held from top 10 (let alone top 3) gloory due to some really major minuses. The fact that the game can't even decide if it is tb or rtsays everything. Very few memorial characters, a haphazard (but interesting) character system, and okayish writing. Very few (ie. less than a handful) of memorable characetrs or quests. Th eonly thing ARC has going for it over over other RPGs is the C&C, which while extremely important, is far from the sole dterminer of whether a game is fun or awesome.

Oh, also, it's title track is fuckin' awesome.
 

thekdawg21

Augur
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
231
Location
Atlantic City, NJ
Project: Eternity
Here's hoping there's a new addition to this thread once AOD comes out.

I'm going to re-try Arcanum right now because of this thread.
 

SCO

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
16,320
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
Propose racofer gets "brutalist savant" custom signature.

:salute:
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
3,520
I vote Fallout. Specifically Fallout 2. Arcanum was good the first time but I can't bear to trudge through the horrible combat problems again. PS:T is good for the story and atmosphere, after that there isn't much reason to play it again (though I have played it a second time). Fallout 2 has enough content that is well differentiated, enough places to explore, and unlike Arcanum the rest of the gameplay isn't so poor that I literally dread half of my path through the game.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom