After listening to them for half an hour, I can conclude that they all probably drank the Kool Aid.
Even down to religion.
It's such a shame that most of the extreme pursuit of corporate interests seem to be written in a lighthearted manner.
Talking to Reed Tobson made me think this man has brain damage instead of a man who lied to himself so much till he believed in the lie as absolute truth. There's nothing sinister. Just a child-like belief in the System. You can act horrified, but there's no way to challenge him and make him admit he's wrong.
It would be really interesting if we can actually dig deeper into what made him think this way. But there doesn't seem to be a way to pinpoint it. It is almost as if the denizens of Edgewater are pre-programmed NPCs who never broke down from their corporate scripting ever since landfall. The ones that did ran to the Deserters' side and colored their hair differently.
Parvati ... seems like to be a person who is in the verge of being 'broken in' by the system. And somehow meeting the player you can either 'let her break or fix her'. That's my impression so far anyway.
Problem is, I just feel the game doesn't have enough setup to justify why I should care about the corporations' welfare aside from a bigger paycheck. Even then, talking to Reed he never really mention a price. I recall in FNV most quest givers would state a price. They'd go 'I can't give you much, but my cause is very important' or 'Here are a X (lot of caps), but don't ask too many questions.' That kinda create the nuance between the two.
But in Edgewater, we're dealing with two factions who are struggling to make ends meet, Edgewater needs Spacer's Choice to survive. While the deserters has established 'independence'. Who is actually the stronger side here?
Thoughts?