CappenVarra
phase-based phantasmist
i'm getting psychic readings from a parallel universe where we chose to play the scholar, and then avoided books and went outside to hunt at every opportunity
i'm getting psychic readings from a parallel universe where we chose to play the scholar, and then avoided books and went outside to hunt at every opportunity
Which is precisely what telling him no did anyway.The issue is he immediately read our body language right when we stepped back. So I figured that putting a pebble into the slingshot would've been pretty obvious to him and with our choice of weapon being as weak as it was, the only thing we'd achieve is antagonize him.
His emotional state irrelevant. Only his intent.mentioned shortly before votes closed that the issue I had with C was that I didn't see it achieving any special surprise round shit and the only difference between C and B in my view was that with C we piss him off and with B we have a chance of him not getting angry.
Frankly, I think that was just you living in the past.I can tell you now that when I remember very clearly when I was contemplating C vs B I could very much see the appeal of just shooting him if we had a gun
So I would’ve been the only one to vote for pumping him full of lead?Edit: for me, having a gun would probably have a chilling effect. I would not shoot a dude just for being creepy. Would have to have some more proof on hand to do it.
Flopping to this:C1 > A2
So either we take Liz in the woods or some quiet book time
Eh, I'll just make the plain and obvious point that our choice of weapon does affect how comfortable we feel pursuing violent solutions to our problems (in both directions). If you think it wouldn't've made a single vote's difference (all it takes to have made a decisive difference) then you are living in some weird fantasyland where codex votes are rock-steady and not prone to erratic swings for all manner of reasons.If the choice were really between killing him and telling him no, I think we would have had a lot more people seriously suggesting that he was a monster than we did to make a kill vote happen. That was my point. That most people didn't want to shoot him. Not you personally.
Anyway, I know how these discussions of ours can go in circles. You say you totally would have voted for shooting him if you had a gun. I say it wouldn't have made a difference. I think we can all move on now.
Well, you are the resident commissar. It's your calling.So I would’ve been the only one to vote for pumping him full of lead?
Eh, I'll just make the plain and obvious point that our choice of weapon does affect how comfortable we feel pursuing violent solutions to our problems (in both directions). If you think it wouldn't've made a single vote's difference (all it takes to have made a decisive difference) then you are living in some weird fantasyland where codex votes are rock-steady and not prone to erratic swings for all manner of reasons.If the choice were really between killing him and telling him no, I think we would have had a lot more people seriously suggesting that he was a monster than we did to make a kill vote happen. That was my point. That most people didn't want to shoot him. Not you personally.
Anyway, I know how these discussions of ours can go in circles. You say you totally would have voted for shooting him if you had a gun. I say it wouldn't have made a difference. I think we can all move on now.
As I recall nearly half the votes were for shooting the guy. Who can say if the vote distribution would have been similar if we had a gun? I, for one, wish we did, and yes I would have shot that motherfucker.So I would’ve been the only one to vote for pumping him full of lead?Edit: for me, having a gun would probably have a chilling effect. I would not shoot a dude just for being creepy. Would have to have some more proof on hand to do it.
I'm actually down with a Hunter/Scholar multiclass. Seems like a good setup for a well-rounded monster hunter. A good Witcher needs to be well-read, after all.i'm getting psychic readings from a parallel universe where we chose to play the scholar, and then avoided books and went outside to hunt at every opportunity
So either we take Liz in the woods
Don't worry, comrade, I'm always ready to execute British imperialist swine with you.So I would’ve been the only one to vote for pumping him full of lead?
treave Let's ask the girls if they have any experience with medicine.
And what medicine do we know that could help Tlalli?
And are there any books here on herbs?
Go-go exaggeration hamster!We are not going to be a world famous philosopher, and we're not going to find magic books of fireball everywhere. We don't have to pick books all the time.
she just dropkicked a monster while she was on fire.
It's my proposed method of breaking up our current three-way tie. Although that same logic can be used to put C1 ahead by flopping from A2 and C4 to C1.It should be up to them individually to express second preferences.