Misconnected
Savant
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2012
- Messages
- 587
Sea you might want to suggest mentioning whether a source is verified, if it's anonymous. As it is, readers could reasonably assume the alleged source is actually a prank, or that it has never existed. [EDIT: if there's one thing readers can usually rely on, it's that in the rare instances where gaming media actually do know what they're spewing, it's because it's shit they've made up themselves.]
It also seems like a golden opportunity to start writing some serious journo shite about IP & Copyrights in video gaming. Despite being massively popular, the franchise has been dead for a decade. In any sane legal framework, everyone and their fucking uncle's camel's parrot would be free to reverse & re-enginner the shit out of every last bit of it, and release it in whatever manner they please - with no regards or obligations to the original creators or subsequent rights holders. The current situation is a massive disservice to both audience and market place - as the history of this particular franchise so very aptly demonstrates.
Because he'd like to preserve his career and not destroy any future opportunities. [EDIT: another opportunity for some meaningful journalism there - how about examining the implications of the lack of job security and legal protection for employees?]
It also seems like a golden opportunity to start writing some serious journo shite about IP & Copyrights in video gaming. Despite being massively popular, the franchise has been dead for a decade. In any sane legal framework, everyone and their fucking uncle's camel's parrot would be free to reverse & re-enginner the shit out of every last bit of it, and release it in whatever manner they please - with no regards or obligations to the original creators or subsequent rights holders. The current situation is a massive disservice to both audience and market place - as the history of this particular franchise so very aptly demonstrates.
What does he have to hide by being anonymous?
Because he'd like to preserve his career and not destroy any future opportunities. [EDIT: another opportunity for some meaningful journalism there - how about examining the implications of the lack of job security and legal protection for employees?]