Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Oblivion Screenshots

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,939
"No. The publishers should KNOW that when signing up a game and alotting the budget for it that there is no way in hades to be able to determine just exactly how much money is going to be needed for it. Therefore they should realize that they may be required to fork over more dough at some point.

Part of QC's job is to make sure things are going at a steady pace and that any future requests for more money are thoroughly justified and that people aren't just wasting the funds.

You don't just shell over a certain amount of money and then expect to not be asked for more later down the road. That's just common sense."

Unless the publisher thinks the devloper is just trying to bleed them for more coin as evidenced with TOEE.

Of course, none of this changes the fatc, that you don't neccessarily need as high of a budget for game play as you do for graphics (or vice versa for that matter) to make them both solid.
 

Otaku_Hanzo

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,463
Location
The state of insanity.
Volourn said:
Unless the publisher thinks the devloper is just trying to bleed them for more coin as evidenced with TOEE.

Again, that's part of the reason QC exists. To ensure the need for extra money is justified.

Volourn said:
Of course, none of this changes the fatc, that you don't neccessarily need as high of a budget for game play as you do for graphics (or vice versa for that matter) to make them both solid.

I agree, and never said you needed the same amount for both, only that if more money is needed to tweak gameplay and is justified, you should do so. Nowadays it's pretty much apparent that more money is going into the graphics engine. I have no problem with that whatsoever. I just think gameplay should get equal, if not more, attention. And that does not mean as much or more money than the graphics side either.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,939
"I agree, and never said you needed the same amount for both, only that if more money is needed to tweak gameplay and is justified, you should do so."

Fair enough. YAY! We both win!!!
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom