Good! Some concrete information, which certainly strengthens the theory (would be even stronger if you had a link to all these allegations). If they are true, I can't argue against it, and I don't really have any interest in that either.
And also, threatening to pull ads on gaming sites for giving bad scores, is certainly on the border of shady business practice, but it is legit.
Just visit forums and stuff if you really want an honest review. People who paid for the game are actually more honest than those who needs to give glowing reviews to continue receiving free passes in the future. It's not rocket science. Which is why restaurant critiques went undercover, they want the real deal; not some set piece bullshit you saw on TV where the cook comes out with a violin and start serenading to the two food reviewers as they fake orgasm over a bowl of noodles.
Just visit forums and stuff if you really want an honest review. People who paid for the game are actually more honest than those who needs to give glowing reviews to continue receiving free passes in the future. It's not rocket science. Which is why restaurant critiques went undercover, they want the real deal; not some set piece bullshit you saw on TV where the cook comes out with a violin and start serenading to the two food reviewers as they fake orgasm over a bowl of noodles.
Reviews? Fuck, this is the age of Youtube. You can just go watch a video of somebody playing the first N hours of the game. Doesn't get any better than that.
qft, I find myself mostly doing this these days.Reviews? Fuck, this is the age of Youtube. You can just go watch a video of somebody playing the first N hours of the game. Doesn't get any better than that.
Some of the comments in the story are the usual hilarious stuff:
Exactly. That is completely what caused the lower score. It is an excellent game, but it was close to a year on some platforms before it was actually playable. That is not going to get you a good score. And for anyone bitching about the deal: Obsidian AGREED to it. Bethesda didn't force them at gunpoint into it. Their arrogance and inability to deliver a functioning product on time (or anywhere close to it), caused them to lose the bonus. Nothing else. Personally I hate to see them go. I loved KOTOR II, New Vegas, and Dungeon Siege III.
Like Fallout 3 didn't have bugs, but of course these people are incapable of thinking for themselves. The reviewers had to find problems to give sub-85 scores and they blamed Obsidian for Bethesda problems. Therefore, according to the fans, it's Obsidian's problem!
Some of the comments in the story are the usual hilarious stuff:
Exactly. That is completely what caused the lower score. It is an excellent game, but it was close to a year on some platforms before it was actually playable. That is not going to get you a good score. And for anyone bitching about the deal: Obsidian AGREED to it. Bethesda didn't force them at gunpoint into it. Their arrogance and inability to deliver a functioning product on time (or anywhere close to it), caused them to lose the bonus. Nothing else. Personally I hate to see them go. I loved KOTOR II, New Vegas, and Dungeon Siege III.
Like Fallout 3 didn't have bugs, but of course these people are incapable of thinking for themselves. The reviewers had to find problems to give sub-85 scores and they blamed Obsidian for Bethesda problems. Therefore, according to the fans, it's Obsidian's problem!
I bought Fallout 3. I also bought Fallout NV collectors' edition. I've put hundreds of hours in both of them. Fallout 3 did not come with a bug that overwrote recent saves right out the gate. The problem with NV wasn't that "it had bugs", it's that the bugs were noticeable, interfered with the game considerably, and in the case of the save killing one, inexcusable. This isn't the first time Obshitian pulled this either, I had my save ruined in NWN2 as well, and never ended up finishing the game as a result.
HehInexcusable for Bethesda's QA.
Thank you Menckenstein and saint_proverbius for good solid links, they do indeed show cold hard facts, and I can't deny them.
qft, I find myself mostly doing this these days.Reviews? Fuck, this is the age of Youtube. You can just go watch a video of somebody playing the first N hours of the game. Doesn't get any better than that.
Keep in mind that for every reviewer that comes out there are 100 others that have a mortgage to pay. Make too big of a stir and not only will you lose your job, no one else will hire you because both they and the publishers won't approve. Turns out that ex-game reviewers don't have many professional prospects outside of the fast food industry. Jeff Gerstmann was lucky enough that he got fired in such a flamboyantly media-covered fashion that he could use that short second of fame to jumpstart his own site.
Inexcusable for Bethesda's QA.
Inexcusable for Bethesda's QA.
Was Bethesda's QA involved with NWN2 as well? Obshitian is renowned for its technical incompetence and it would appear it is finally going to bury them once and for all, at which point the codex rabble will blame "consoletards", "Bethesduh", "gaming journalism" and just about everybody else except the people who actually fucked up, just like they did with Troika.
But their last one was technically competent??? I also believe South Park's going to be solid bugwise, considering it's going to be a jrpg with factions on their own engine. Also "not being fun" is a far greater problem than bugs, no one gives a fuck about Bethesda's bugs, not even the one that literally makes them unplayable on the PS3 if you play for too long.Inexcusable for Bethesda's QA.
Was Bethesda's QA involved with NWN2 as well? Obshitian is renowned for its technical incompetence and it would appear it is finally going to bury them once and for all, at which point the codex rabble will blame "consoletards", "Bethesduh", "gaming journalism" and just about everybody else except the people who actually fucked up, just like they did with Troika.
But their last one was technically competent???
I also believe South Park's going to be solid bugwise, considering it's going to be a jrpg with factions on their own engine.
Also "not being fun" is a far greater problem than bugs, no one gives a fuck about Bethesda's bugs, not even the one that literally makes them unplayable on the PS3 if you play for too long.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim/critic-reviewsThe game was fun enough for an 85+ though, the bugs is what did them in, since they can ruin an otherwise good game.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim/critic-reviewsThe game was fun enough for an 85+ though, the bugs is what did them in, since they can ruin an otherwise good game.
Only one slightly negative review that mentions it doesn't work once you play long enough.